How Different Personalities Benefit From Gamification

Author:

Ghaban Wad1,Hendley Robert1

Affiliation:

1. School of Computer Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

Abstract

Abstract Several studies indicate the benefit of mapping gamification elements to personality. However, this mapping requires a strong understanding of the relationship between gamification elements and personality. The existing research that has tried to address this relationship is based on a self-report questionnaire that is obtained from only those learners who complete the entire study. Unfortunately, a bias may result from first forcing learners to complete an entire study and then ignoring learners who drop out in the middle of a study. To overcome this bias, we use a more objective approach to understand the relationship between personality and gamification. In our study, we use the dropout rate as a proxy for learner motivation. We hypothesize that learners who are more motivated by gamification elements will use the gamified website longer. Furthermore, because we use a different method than previous studies used, we analyse our data differently. Our solution is to use survival analysis to analyse our data, which confirms the benefit of using gamification to enhance learner motivation. Our results point to the relationship between the response of different personalities and gamification elements. In further studies, we recommend to use this same approach but with more gamification elements. RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS Gamification plays an important role in enhancing learners’ motivation and engagement. Different personalities respond differently to gamification elements. The dropout rate can be used to measure learners’ motivation. Enhancing the motivation of learners does not necessarily improve their learning.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Human-Computer Interaction,Software

Reference58 articles.

1. Evaluating the effectiveness of distance learning: a comparison using meta-analysis;Allen;J. Commun.,2004

2. Foundations of educational theory for online learning;Ally;Theory Pract. Online Learn.,2004

3. Comparison of the neo-ffi, the neo-ffi-r and an alternative short version of the neo-pi-r (neo-60) in Swiss and Spanish samples;Aluja;Pers. Individ. Dif.,2005

Cited by 24 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3