Traversing the Aging Research and Health Equity Divide: Toward Intersectional Frameworks of Research Justice and Participation

Author:

Gilmore-Bykovskyi Andrea12ORCID,Croff Raina3,Glover Crystal M45ORCID,Jackson Jonathan D67ORCID,Resendez Jason8,Perez Adriana9,Zuelsdorff Megan1,Green-Harris Gina2,Manly Jennifer J1011

Affiliation:

1. University of Wisconsin-Madison Center for Health Disparities Research, Madison, WI, USA

2. University of Wisconsin–Madison School of Nursing, Madison, WI, USA

3. NIA Layton Aging and Alzheimer’s Disease Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA

4. Division of Behavioral Sciences, Rush Medical College, Chicago, Illinois, USA

5. Rush Alzheimer’s Disease Center, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA

6. Community Access, Recruitment, & Engagement (CARE) Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

7. Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

8. UsAgainstAlzheimer’s, Washington, District of Columbia, USA

9. University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

10. Department of Neurology, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York City, New York, USA

11. Taub Institute for Research on Alzheimer’s Disease and the Aging Brain, Columbia University, New York City, New York, USA

Abstract

Abstract Meaningful reductions in racial and ethnic inequities in chronic diseases of aging remain unlikely without major advancements in the inclusion of minoritized populations in aging research. While sparse, studies investigating research participation disparities have predominantly focused on individual-level factors and behavioral change, overlooking the influence of study design, structural factors, and social determinants of health on participation. This is also reflected in conventional practices that consistently fail to address established participation barriers, such as study requirements that impose financial, transportation, linguistic, and/or logistical barriers that disproportionately burden participants belonging to minoritized populations. These shortcomings not only risk exacerbating distrust toward research and researchers, but also introduce significant selection biases, diminishing our ability to detect differential mechanisms of risk, resilience, and response to interventions across subpopulations. This forum article examines the intersecting factors that drive both health inequities in aging and disparate participation in aging research among minoritized populations. Using an intersectional, social justice, and emancipatory lens, we characterize the role of social determinants, historical contexts, and contemporaneous structures in shaping research accessibility and inclusion. We also introduce frameworks to accelerate transformative theoretical approaches to fostering equitable inclusion of minoritized populations in aging research.

Funder

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology,Gerontology,General Medicine

Reference50 articles.

1. Recruitment and retention of older minorities in mental health services research;Areán;The Gerontologist,2003

2. The Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis and public perceptions of biomedical research: A focus group study;Bates;Journal of the National Medical Association,2004

3. On racism: A new standard for publishing on racial health inequities;Boyd;Health Affairs Blog,2020

4. The legacy of Tuskegee and trust in medical care: Is Tuskegee responsible for race differences in mistrust of medical care?;Brandon;Journal of the National Medical Association,2005

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3