Effect of Moderate and Radical Rules on High-Caste Behavior and Norms in India
Affiliation:
1. Department of Economics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City , USA
Abstract
Abstract
Development and legal researchers hypothesize that a moderate law may be more effective than a radical one in changing behavior. This study tests this hypothesis in the context of discriminatory sharing norms practiced by high-caste individuals against low-caste individuals in India. The study employs a lab-in-the-field experiment in which it influences (a) high-caste participants’ social norms of sharing money with a low-caste participant and (b) introduces either a “moderate” or a “radical” rule, that is, a rule that is closer or further away from the social norm and requires high-caste participants to share a minimum amount of their money with the low-caste participant. Breaking the rule entails incurring a small fine. This study finds that the effectiveness of the moderate versus radical rule in changing behavior and norms depends on the status quo social norm. This paper provides causal empirical evidence on how social norms influence laws’ effectiveness in inducing behavioral and norm change.
Funder
National Science Foundation
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Development,Accounting
Reference48 articles.
1. Social Norms and the Enforcement of Laws;Acemoglu;Journal of the European Economic Association,2017
2. Formal Law as a Magnet to Reform Custom;Aldashev;Economic Development and Cultural Change,2012
3. Legal Reform in the Presence of a Living Custom: An Economic Approach;Aldashev;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2011
4. Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach;Becker;Journal of political economy,1968
5. A Theory of Conformity;Bernheim;Journal of Political Economy,1994