Affiliation:
1. Department of Economics and Population Research Center, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, USA
2. Department of Economics, Ashoka University , Sonepat, India
Abstract
Abstract
While increasing years of schooling has been a long-standing development priority, the associated fiscal costs and benefits have been less studied, because of a lack of appropriate data. Recently, an UNESCO-funded project measured subsidies, by levels of schooling, from all levels of government, in eight developing countries including Nepal. The household-level Nepal Living Standards Measurement Survey provides information to estimate the degree of formality, tax payments, and benefit receipts as a function of schooling years. Using a simple Mincer-like model, this study estimates the fiscal externality of an additional year of school. It finds that within primary school, fiscal benefits and costs, on the margin, are quite balanced, with subsidies close to the present value of future taxes minus benefits. At higher levels of schooling, however, marginal fiscal benefits exceed costs by 5 percent of per capita consumption. This contrasts with previous literature on social returns and assumptions underlying multilateral development goals.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Development,Accounting
Reference31 articles.
1. “Reforming Value Added Tax System in Developing World: The Case of Nepal.”;Acharya;Business and Management Studies,2016
2. Guidelines for the Economic Analysis of Projects
3. Proposed Loan and Technical Assistance Grant Nepal: South Asia Subregional Economic Cooperation Highway Improvement Project;Asian Development Bank,2018
4. “Informality and the Expansion of Social Protection Programs: Evidence from Mexico.”;Azuara;Journal of Health Economics,2013