Affiliation:
1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine , 453 Quarry Road, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA
Abstract
Abstract
Adverse mental health status has been linked to less successful surgical outcomes across several orthopaedic subspecialties. Mental health represents a modifiable risk factor that can be optimized preoperatively to maximize outcomes for hip preservation surgery. This study examines the relationship between preoperative mental health status and preoperative and postoperative outcomes for adolescent and adult patients undergoing hip preservation surgery. A prospectively enrolled registry of patients undergoing periacetabular osteotomy or hip arthroscopy at a single institution between 2013 and 2021 was retrospectively reviewed to collect demographics and outcomes before and after surgery. We identified patients self-reporting anxiety/depression or no anxiety/depression preoperatively based on responses to the EuroQol-5D anxiety/depression dimension and compared their preoperative and postoperative Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (HOOSs) using multivariable linear models and multivariable mixed effects models. Seventy-three patients were included, 40 patients with no anxiety/depression and 33 patients with anxiety/depression. Patients with anxiety/depression had worse preoperative HOOS pain (b = −12.5, P = .029), function in daily living (b = −12.0, P = .045), function in sports and recreational activities (b = −15.1, P = .030), and quality of life (b = −16.3, P = .005) as compared to patients with no anxiety/depression. Patients with anxiety/depression had worse postoperative HOOS compared to patients with no anxiety/depression, but these associations were not statistically significant after adjusting for preoperative HOOS. There were no significant differences between both groups for percent achieving minimal clinically important difference. Patients who reported anxiety/depression preoperatively had worse preoperative pain and function before hip preservation surgery, with both groups achieving similar levels of clinical effectiveness.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)