The potential of ChatGPT in medicine: an example analysis of nephrology specialty exams in Poland

Author:

Nicikowski Jan12ORCID,Szczepański Mikołaj12ORCID,Miedziaszczyk Miłosz3ORCID,Kudliński Bartosz2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Zielona Gora, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences , Student Scientific Section of Clinical Nutrition, Zielona Góra, Poland

2. University of Zielona Góra, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine , Zielona Góra , Poland

3. Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Department of General and Transplant Surgery , Poznan , Poland

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background In November 2022, OpenAI released a chatbot named ChatGPT, a product capable of processing natural language to create human-like conversational dialogue. It has generated a lot of interest, including from the scientific community and the medical science community. Recent publications have shown that ChatGPT can correctly answer questions from medical exams such as the United States Medical Licensing Examination and other specialty exams. To date, there have been no studies in which ChatGPT has been tested on specialty questions in the field of nephrology anywhere in the world. Methods Using the ChatGPT-3.5 and -4.0 algorithms in this comparative cross-sectional study, we analysed 1560 single-answer questions from the national specialty exam in nephrology from 2017 to 2023 that were available in the Polish Medical Examination Center's question database along with answer keys. Results Of the 1556 questions posed to ChatGPT-4.0, correct answers were obtained with an accuracy of 69.84%, compared with ChatGPT-3.5 (45.70%, P = .0001) and with the top results of medical doctors (85.73%, P = .0001). Of the 13 tests, ChatGPT-4.0 exceeded the required ≥60% pass rate in 11 tests passed, and scored higher than the average of the human exam results. Conclusion ChatGPT-3.5 was not spectacularly successful in nephrology exams. The ChatGPT-4.0 algorithm was able to pass most of the analysed nephrology specialty exams. New generations of ChatGPT achieve similar results to humans. The best results of humans are better than those of ChatGPT-4.0.

Funder

Ministry of Science and Higher Education

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference40 articles.

1. Evaluating the feasibility of ChatGPT in healthcare: an analysis of multiple clinical and research scenarios;Cascella;J Med Syst,2023

2. Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models;Kung;PLOS Digit Health,2023

3. Artificial intelligence in ophthalmology: a comparative analysis of GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and human expertise in answering StatPearls questions;Moshirfar;Cureus,2023

4. ChatGPT fails the internal medicine state specialization exam in Poland: artificial intelligence still has much to learn;Suwała;Polish Arch Intern Med,2023

5. ChatGPT takes on the European exam in core cardiology: an artificial intelligence success story?;Skalidis;Eur Heart J Digit Health,2023

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3