Intravenous vs Oral Acetaminophen for Analgesia After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Trial

Author:

Wilson Sylvia H1,Wolf Bethany J2,Robinson Stefanie M13,Nelson Cecil45,Hebbar Latha1

Affiliation:

1. Departments of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine

2. Public Health Sciences

3. East Carolina Anesthesia Associates, Greenville, North Carolina, USA

4. Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA

5. Regional Obstetrical Consultants, Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA

Abstract

Abstract Objective Examination of postoperative analgesia with intravenous and oral acetaminophen. Design Prospective, three-arm, nonblinded, randomized clinical trial. Setting A single academic medical center. Subjects Parturients scheduled for elective cesarean delivery. Methods This trial randomized 141 parturients to receive intravenous acetaminophen (1 g every eight hours, three doses), oral acetaminophen (1 g every eight hours, three doses), or no acetaminophen. All patients received a standardized neuraxial anesthetic with intrathecal opioids and scheduled postoperative ketorolac. The primary outcome, 24-hour opioid consumption, was evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallace test and Tukey-Kramer adjustment for multiple comparisons. Secondary outcomes included 48-hour opioid consumption, first opioid rescue, pain scores, patient satisfaction, times to ambulation and discharge, and side effects. Results Over 18 months, 141 parturients with similar demographic variables completed the study. Median (interquartile range) opioid consumption in intravenous morphine milligram equivalents at 24 hours was 0 (5), 0 (7), and 5 (7) for the intravenous, oral, and no groups, respectively, and differed between groups (global P = 0.017). Opioid consumption and other secondary outcomes did not differ between the intravenous vs oral or oral vs no groups. Opioid consumption was reduced at 24 hours with intravenous vs no acetaminophen (P = 0.015). Patients receiving no acetaminophen had 5.8 times the odds of consuming opioids (P = 0.036), consumed 40% more opioids controlling for time (P = 0.041), and had higher pain scores with ambulation (P = 0.004) compared with the intravenous group. Conclusions Intravenous acetaminophen did not reduce 24-hour opioid consumption or other outcomes compared with oral acetaminophen. Intravenous acetaminophen did decrease opioid consumption and pain scores compared with no acetaminophen.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Clinical Neurology,General Medicine

Reference20 articles.

1. Vital signs: Overdoses of prescription opioid pain relievers and other drugs among women—United States, 1999–2010;Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC);MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep,2013

2. Opioid overdose deaths rose fivefold among US women in 10 years;McCarthy;BMJ,2013

3. Persistent opioid use following cesarean delivery: Patterns and predictors among opioid-naïve women;Bateman;Am J Obstet Gynecol,2016

4. Annual summary of vital statistics: 2010–2011;Hamilton;Pediatrics,2013

5. Analgesia after cesarean delivery: Patient evaluations and costs of five opioid techniques;Cohen;Reg Anesth,1991

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3