Global access and quality of conservative kidney management

Author:

Hole Barnaby1,Wearne Nicola2,Arruebo Silvia3,Caskey Fergus J1,Damster Sandrine3,Donner Jo-Ann3ORCID,Jha Vivekanand4,Levin Adeera5,Nangaku Masaomi6ORCID,Saad Syed7,Tonelli Marcello8ORCID,Ye Feng7,Okpechi Ikechi G7ORCID,Bello Aminu K7,Johnson David W9,Davison Sara N7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol , Bristol , UK

2. Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town , Cape Town , South Africa

3. The International Society of Nephrology , Brussels , Belgium

4. George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales (UNSW) , New Delhi , India

5. Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia , Vancouver, British Columbia , Canada

6. Division of Nephrology and Endocrinology, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine , Tokyo , Japan

7. Division of Nephrology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta , Edmonton, Alberta , Canada

8. Department of Medicine, University of Calgary , Calgary, Alberta , Canada

9. Centre for Kidney Disease Research, University of Queensland at Princess Alexandra Hospital , Brisbane, Queensland , Australia

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Conservative kidney management (CKM) describes supportive care for people living with kidney failure who choose not to receive or are unable to access kidney replacement therapy (KRT). This study captured the global availability of CKM services and funding. Methods Data came from the International Society of Nephrology Global Kidney Health survey conducted between June and September 2022. Availability of CKM, infrastructure, guidelines, medications and training were evaluated. Results CKM was available in some form in 61% of the 165 responding countries. CKM chosen through shared decision-making was available in 53%. Choice-restricted CKM—for those unable to access KRT—was available in 39%. Infrastructure to provide CKM chosen through shared decision-making was associated with national income level, reported as being “generally available” in most healthcare settings for 71% of high-income countries, 50% of upper-middle-income countries, 33% of lower-middle-income countries and 42% of low-income countries. For choice-restricted CKM, these figures were 29%, 50%, 67% and 58%, respectively. Essential medications for pain and palliative care were available in just over half of the countries, highly dependent upon income setting. Training for caregivers in symptom management in CKM was available in approximately a third of countries. Conclusions Most countries report some capacity for CKM. However, there is considerable variability in terms of how CKM is defined, as well as what and how much care is provided. Poor access to CKM perpetuates unmet palliative care needs, and must be addressed, particularly in low-resource settings where death from untreated kidney failure is common.

Funder

International Society of Nephrology

University of Alberta

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3