Author:
Pang Menglan,Hanley James A
Abstract
Abstract
Epidemiologists commonly use an adjusted hazard ratio or incidence density ratio, or a standardized mortality ratio, to measure a difference in all-cause mortality rates. They seldom translate it into an age-, time-, or probability-based measure that would be easier to communicate and to relate to. Several articles have shown how to translate from a standardized mortality ratio or hazard ratio to a longevity difference, a difference in actuarial ages, or a probability of being outlived. In this paper, we describe the settings where these translations are and are not appropriate and provide some of the heuristics behind the formulae. The tools that yield differences in “effective age” and in longevity are applicable when both 1) the mortality rate ratio (hazard ratio) is constant over age and 2) the rates themselves are log-linear in age. The “probability/odds of being outlived” metric is applicable whenever the first condition holds, and thus it provides no direct information on the magnitude of the effective age/longevity difference.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference28 articles.
1. Baseball players live longer than football players, average men;Harvard Gazette,31, 2019
2. All-cause and cause-specific mortality among Major League Baseball players;Nguyen;JAMA Intern Med,2019
3. Former NFL players die at a faster rate than other professional athletes, study finds;Chakradhar;STAT,24, 2019
4. How old are you, really? Communicating chronic risk through ‘effective age’ of your body and organs;Spiegelhalter;BMC Med Inform Decis Mak,2016
5. Risk and rate advancement periods as measures of exposure impact on the occurrence of chronic diseases;Brenner;Epidemiology,1993
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献