Thirdhand Smoke Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behavior: Development of Reliable and Valid Self-report Measures

Author:

Record Rachael A1ORCID,Greiner Lydia H2,Wipfli Heather3,Pugel Jessica2,Matt Georg E2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Communication, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA

2. Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA

3. Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

Abstract

Abstract Introduction This study sought to provide essential tobacco control tools by testing the reliability and validity of new self-report scales developed to assess thirdhand smoke (THS) (ie, toxic tobacco residue) related knowledge, attitudes, and behavior (KAB). Aims and Methods Items for the KAB scales were adapted from established secondhand smoke (SHS) measures, reviewed to support face validity, and tested in a longitudinal online survey evaluating THS health messages. Participants were California adults at risk of THS exposure. For 7 months, the three KAB scales were completed monthly, and data from the first (n = 1086), third (n = 315), and seventh (n = 301) month surveys were used in these analyses. Results All three scales demonstrated consistent reliability and single-factor loading at all three timepoints for knowledge (αrange: .87–.90), attitude (αrange: .84–.87), and behavior (αrange: .80–.86). Similarly, analyses supported scale convergent validity (scale correlations rrange: .45–.85; all p values <.001), discriminant validity between smokers and nonsmokers (knowledge Cohen’s drange: .57–.61, all p values <.001; attitude Cohen’s drange: .78–.82, all p values <.001; behavior Cohen’s drange: .90–.99, all p values <.001), and predictive validity (range R2KAB: .41–.48; all p values <.001). Conclusions KAB scales about THS provide new opportunities for tobacco control advocates and scholars to identify gaps in knowledge, misperceptions, and obstacles to behavior change in order to guide the design of novel tobacco control policies and interventions. Implications Numerous scales have been vetted as reliable and valid measures for assessing SHS-related KABs. Currently, standard measures of THS KABs are not available. This study tested three THS scales to fill this gap. The present findings provide tobacco control advocates, scholars, and practitioners tools for assessing KABs related to THS. This information is critical to development, implementation, and evaluation of novel tobacco control strategies.

Funder

California Tobacco-Related Disease Research Program

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3