Affiliation:
1. Department of Health and Kinesiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
2. Brooks College of Health, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Advertisement warnings are often overlooked, which reduces the opportunity for risk communication.
Methods
We used Prolific to survey 1131 young adults (18–35) who currently used e-cigarettes or tobacco products. We randomized participants to one of four warning conditions: black text on white background (BW), white on black (WB), black on yellow (BY), and yellow on black (YB). We examined associations between condition and attention, recall, ad appeal, perceived message effectiveness (PME), and intentions to use e-cigarettes using chi-square and analysis of variance (ANOVA) where appropriate. We conducted logistic regressions by condition for attention and recall controlling for demographics and tobacco use.
Results
The warning was selected as the most attention-capturing area of the advertisement more often by those exposed to yellow warnings than white (59.9% vs. 46.8%), even after controlling for demographics and tobacco use (p < .05). Recall was greater among those exposed to yellow warnings than white (44.2% vs. 37.3%), which held in controlled models. There were no significant differences between yellow and white warnings for ad appeals, PME, or intentions to use. In subanalyses, WB warnings generated higher PME (10.1 vs. 9.5) and lower intentions to use e-cigarettes (3.0 vs. 3.3) than black on white (BW) (each p < .05).
Conclusions
Yellow warning color increases attention and recall of the warning, but this increase in attention did not translate to differences in downstream effects. Among currently mandated warning variations, the white text on black background warning appears more effective than the BW. Future research should examine whether differences translate to behavior change.
Implications
We tested color variations of the FDA-mandated nicotine text warning on e-cigarette advertisements. Yellow variations (yellow text on black background and BY) better-captured attention and increased warning recall compared to the mandated black and white warnings. Among the FDA-mandated BW and WB warnings, the WB variation appears more effective, generating higher perceived message effectiveness and lower intentions to use e-cigarettes. Given the difficulty in implementing pictorial warnings in the United States, color might represent an alternative to improve warning effectiveness. Findings may also be applicable to those designing tobacco-related health communications.
Funder
National Cancer Institute
NIH
FDA Center for Tobacco Products
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference18 articles.
1. Deeming tobacco products to be subject to the federal food, drug, and cosmetic act, as amended by the family smoking prevention and tobacco control act; Restrictions on the sale and distribution of tobacco products and required warning statements for tobacco products. final rule;Food and Drug Administration, HHS;Fed Regist,2016
2. Communication effectiveness and format effects on in-ad disclosure of health warnings;Popper;J Public Policy Mark,1989
3. An evaluation of health warnings in cigarette advertisements using standard market research methods: what does it mean to warn?;Fischer;Tob Control,1993
4. The effects of warning-label placement in print ADS: a social contract perspective;Torres;J Advert,2007
5. An experimental study of the effects of electronic cigarette warnings on young adult nonsmokers’ perceptions and behavioral intentions;Mays;Tob Induc Dis,2016
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献