How Does the Use of Flavored Nicotine Vaping Products Relate to Progression Toward Quitting Smoking? Findings From the 2016 and 2018 ITC 4CV Surveys

Author:

Li Lin1ORCID,Borland Ron1ORCID,Cummings Kenneth Michael23,Fong Geoffrey T456,Gravely Shannon4,Smith Danielle M7ORCID,Goniewicz Maciej L7ORCID,O’Connor Richard J7,Thompson Mary E8,McNeill Ann910

Affiliation:

1. Melbourne Centre for Behaviour Change, School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

2. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA

3. Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA

4. Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada

5. School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada

6. Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada

7. Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA

8. Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada

9. Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK

10. Shaping Public hEalth poliCies To Reduce ineqUalities and harm (SPECTRUM), UK

Abstract

Abstract Introduction There is limited research on the role of flavors in nicotine vaping products (NVPs) in relation to smoking. We examined patterns of flavor use in NVPs in relation to progression toward quitting. Aims and Methods Data come from 886 concurrent users of NVPs (at least weekly) and cigarettes who were first surveyed in 2016 and then successfully recontacted in 2018 as part of the ITC 4CV Surveys conducted in Australia, Canada, England, and the United States. Participants were asked about their main vaping flavor categorized as: (1) tobacco or unflavored, (2) menthol or mint flavored, and (3) “sweet” flavors (eg, fruit or candy). We examined whether flavor was associated with progression toward quitting smoking between survey years. Results Overall, 11.1% of baseline concurrent users quit smoking by 2018. Compared with users of tobacco flavors, those vaping “sweet” flavors were more likely to quit smoking between surveys (13.8% vs. 9.6%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01–2.58, p < .05), but those using menthol flavors were no more likely to quit smoking (8.3% vs. 9.6%, aOR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.43–1.47, p = .69). Among those who had quit smoking in 2018, 52.0% were still vaping, which was lower than the 65.8% among continuing smokers (aOR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.39–0.92, p = .02). Sweet flavor users were no more likely to continue vaping compared with tobacco flavor users, either for those continuing smoking or those having quit smoking by 2018. There was a net shift away from tobacco flavor among those who continued to vape at follow-up. Conclusions Use of fruit and other sweet flavored e-liquids is positively related to smokers’ transition away from cigarettes. Implications With multiple jurisdictions considering limiting or banning the sale of flavored NVPs, it is important to consider how such policies may impact smokers using NVPs to transition away from cigarette smoking. Our results indicate that vapers who used sweet flavors were more likely to transition away from cigarette smoking and quit cigarette use, at least in the short term, compared with those who used tobacco or unflavored NVPs. Randomized clinical trials are needed to establish if the observed association between use of flavored e-liquids and smoking cessation is due to self-selection or is truly causal.

Funder

National Cancer Institute

Canadian Institutes of Health Research

National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia

Ontario Institute for Cancer Research

Canadian Cancer Society

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3