The Comparative Effectiveness of Varenicline and Nicotine Patches for Smoking Abstinence During Pregnancy: Evidence From a Population-based Cohort Study

Author:

Choi Stephanie K Y1ORCID,Tran Duong T1,Kemp-Casey Anna2,Preen David B3,Randall Deborah4,Einarsdottir Kristjana5,Jorm Louisa R1ORCID,Havard Alys16

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Big Data Research in Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

2. Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia

3. School of Population and Global Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia

4. Northern Clinical School, Women and Babies Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

5. Centre of Public Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland

6. National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

Abstract

Abstract Introduction In the general population, varenicline is consistently shown to be more efficacious for smoking cessation than nicotine replacement therapy (NRT). Current clinical guidelines for the management of smoking during pregnancy recommend against the use of varenicline, whilst supporting the use of NRT. However, little is known about the comparative effectiveness of these smoking cessation therapies among pregnant women. Aims and Methods Routinely-collected records of all births in two Australian States during 2011 and 2012 were used to create a population-based cohort of women who smoked during the first half of pregnancy. Pharmaceutical dispensing data were used to identify varenicline and nicotine patch dispensings in the first half of pregnancy. Propensity score matching was used to account for the potentially different distribution of confounding factors between the treatment groups. The outcome was defined as smoking abstinence during the second half of pregnancy. Results After propensity score-matching, our cohort comprised 60 women who used varenicline and 60 who used nicotine patches during the first half of pregnancy. More varenicline users (33.3%, 95% CI: 21.7%–46.7%) quit smoking than nicotine patch users (13.3%, 95% CI: 5.9%–24.6%). The adjusted rate difference was 24.2% (95% CI: 10.2%–38.2%) and the adjusted relative risk was 2.8 (95% CI: 1.4–5.7). Conclusions Varenicline was almost three times more effective than nicotine patches in assisting pregnant women to quit smoking. Further studies are needed to corroborate our results. Together with data on the safety of varenicline during pregnancy, evidence regarding the relative benefit of varenicline and NRT during pregnancy important for informing clinical decisions for pregnant smokers. Implications This study is the first to measure the comparative effectiveness of varenicline and nicotine patches during pregnancy – women using varenicline were almost three times as likely to quit smoking than those using nicotine patches. This study addressed a clinically important question using an observational study, noting that there is an absence of evidence from randomized controlled trials because of the ethical issues associated with including pregnant women in clinical trials of medicines of unknown safety.

Funder

National Health and Medical Research Council

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference53 articles.

1. Exposure to tobacco, environmental tobacco smoke and nicotine in pregnancy: a pragmatic overview of reviews of maternal and child outcomes, effectiveness of interventions and barriers and facilitators to quitting;Gould;Int J Environ Res Public Health.,2020

2. Prevalence of smoking during pregnancy and associated risk factors among Canadian women: a national survey;Al-Sahab;BMC Pregnancy Childbirth.,2010

3. Changes in smoking rates among pregnant women and the general female population in Australia, Finland, Norway, and Sweden;Reitan;Nicotine Tob Res.,2017

4. Who smokes during pregnancy? An analysis of the German Perinatal Quality Survey 2005;Schneider;Public Health,2008

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3