Use of Sex-Specific Body Mass Index to Optimize Low Correlation With Height and High Correlation With Fatness: A UK Biobank Study
Author:
Feng Qi,Kim Jean H,Xie Junqing,Bešević Jelena,Conroy Megan,Omiyale Wemimo,Wu Yushan,Woodward Mark,Lacey Ben,Allen Naomi
Abstract
Abstract
Body mass index (BMI; weight (kg)/height (m)2) is commonly used to measure general adiposity. However, evidence of its appropriateness for males and females remains inconsistent. We aimed to identify the most appropriate sex-specific power value that height should be raised to in the formula and the value that would make it achieve height independency and body fatness dependency. We randomly assigned UK Biobank participants recruited in the United Kingdom between 2006 and 2010 (n = 489,873; mean age = 56.5 years; 94.2% White) to training and testing sets (80%:20%). Using height raised to the power of −50.00 to 50.00, we identified the optimal power value that either minimized correlation with height or maximized correlation with body fat percentage, using age-adjusted correlations. The optimal power values for height were 1.77 for males and 1.39 for females. The new formulas resulted in 4.5% of females and 2.4% of males being reclassified into a different BMI category. The formulas did not show significant improvement (in terms of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, and specificity) in identifying individuals with excessive body fat percentage or in predicting risk of all-cause mortality. Therefore, the conventional BMI formula is still valuable in research and disease screening for both sexes.
Funder
Program
Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Investigator
Wellcome Trust, UK Research and Innovation, the British Heart Foundation, Cancer Research UK, and the National Institute for Health and Care Research
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference32 articles.
1. Association between adiposity and cardiovascular outcomes: an umbrella review and meta-analysis of observational and Mendelian randomization studies;Kim;Eur Heart J.,2021
2. Anthropometric and adiposity indicators and risk of type 2 diabetes: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of cohort studies;Jayedi;BMJ.,2022
3. Body-mass index and incidence of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studies;Renehan;Lancet.,2008
4. Obesity and infectious diseases: pathophysiology and epidemiology of a double pandemic condition;Pugliese;Int J Obes (Lond).,2022
5. BMI and all cause mortality: systematic review and non-linear dose-response meta-analysis of 230 cohort studies with 3.74 million deaths among 30.3 million participants;Aune;BMJ.,2016