Author:
Takahashi Saki,Peluso Michael J,Hakim Jill,Turcios Keirstinne,Janson Owen,Routledge Isobel,Busch Michael P,Hoh Rebecca,Tai Viva,Kelly J Daniel,Martin Jeffrey N,Deeks Steven G,Henrich Timothy J,Greenhouse Bryan,Rodríguez-Barraquer Isabel
Abstract
Abstract
Serosurveys are a key resource for measuring severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) population exposure. A growing body of evidence suggests that asymptomatic and mild infections (together making up over 95% of all infections) are associated with lower antibody titers than severe infections. Antibody levels also peak a few weeks after infection and decay gradually. We developed a statistical approach to produce estimates of cumulative incidence from raw seroprevalence survey results that account for these sources of spectrum bias. We incorporate data on antibody responses on multiple assays from a postinfection longitudinal cohort, along with epidemic time series to account for the timing of a serosurvey relative to how recently individuals may have been infected. We applied this method to produce estimates of cumulative incidence from 5 large-scale SARS-CoV-2 serosurveys across different settings and study designs. We identified substantial differences between raw seroprevalence and cumulative incidence of over 2-fold in the results of some surveys, and we provide a tool for practitioners to generate cumulative incidence estimates with preset or custom parameter values. While unprecedented efforts have been launched to generate SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence estimates over this past year, interpretation of results from these studies requires properly accounting for both population-level epidemiologic context and individual-level immune dynamics.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference66 articles.
1. SeroTracker: a global SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence dashboard;Arora;Infect Dis.,2021
2. Serological evidence of human infection with SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis;Chen;Global Health.,2021
3. Estimating prevalence from the results of a screening test;Rogan;Am J Epidemiol.,1978
4. Bayesian analysis of tests with unknown specificity and sensitivity;Gelman;Appl Stat.,2020
5. Jointly modeling prevalence, sensitivity and specificity for optimal sample allocation;Larremore;bioRxiv
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献