A core domain set for pyoderma gangrenosum trial outcomes - an international e-Delphi and consensus study from the UPGRADE initiative
Author:
Jacobson Michael E1ORCID, Rick Jonathan W2, Gerbens Louise A A3, Baghoomian Wenelia1, Gould Lisa J4, Marzano Angelo V56, Chen Diana M7, Oakes Debbie L4, Dissemond Joachim8, Yamamoto Toshiyuki9, Shinkai Kanade10, Nolan Barbara11, Lobato Dan11, Thomas Kim S12ORCID, Ortega-Loayza Alex G1, Rick Jonathan, Gould Lisa J, Marzano Angelo V, Garg Amit, Chen Diana M, Oakes Debbie L, Dissemond Joachim, Herfarth Hans, Friedman Marcia A, Alavi Afsaneh, Yamamoto Toshiyuki, Gerbens Louise A A, Thomas Kim S, Ortega-Loayza Alex G, Jacobson Michael E, Baghoomian Wenelia, Rick Jonathan, Gerbens Louise A A, Thomas Kim S, Ortega-Loayza Alex G, Imre Mihaly, Rick Jonathan, Hampton Philip, Thomas Kim, Kolios Antonios, Bolognia Jean, Borradori Luca, Moelleken Maurice, Jacobson Michael, Gray Ashley, Maronese Carlo Alberto, Wallach Daniel, Croitoru David, Kaffenberger Ben, Marzano Angelo Valerio, Gould Lisa Jeanne, Williams Pete, Korman Neil, Chen Diana, Amber Kyle, Tolkachjov Stan N, Purvis Caitlin, Benskin Linda, Shinkai Kanade, Ortega-Loayza Alex G,
Affiliation:
1. Department of Dermatology, Oregon Health and Science University , Portland, OR , USA 2. Department of Dermatology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences , Little Rock, AR , USA 3. Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC, location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public health, Infection, and Immunity , Amsterdam , The Netherlands 4. South Shore Health Center for Wound Healing , Weymouth, MA , USA 5. Dermatology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico , Milan , Italy 6. Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano , Milan , Italy 7. Genentech Incorporated , South San Francisco, CA , USA 8. Department of Dermatology, Venerology, and Allergology, University of Essen-Duisburg , Essen , Germany 9. Department of Dermatology, Fukushima Medical University , Fukushima , Japan 10. Department of Dermatology, University of California , San Francisco, San Francisco, California , USA 11. Patient representative 12. Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham , Nottingham , UK
Abstract
Abstract
Importance
Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a rare ulcerative skin condition with no current standardized outcomes or outcome measures. With a rich investigational therapeutic pipeline, standardization of outcomes and improvement of data quality and interpretability will promote the appropriate and consistent evaluation of potential new therapies. Core Outcome Sets (COS) are agreed standardized sets of outcomes that represent the minimum that should be measured and reported in all clinical trials of a specific condition.
Objective
To identify and reach consensus on which domains (what to be measured) should be included in the Understanding Pyoderma Gangrenosum: Review and Analysis of Disease Effects (UPGRADE) Core Domain Set for PG clinical trials.
Design
Collaborative discussions between patients and PG experts, and a systematic review of the literature identified items and prospective domains. A three-round international eDelphi exercise was performed to prioritize the domains and refine the provisional items (consensus: ≥70% of participants rating a domain as ‘extremely important’ and <15% of participants voting ‘not important’, followed by an international meeting to reach consensus on the core domain set (consensus: <30% disagreement).
Setting
Item generation discussions and consensus meetings were hosted via online video conferences. Delphi exercise and consensus voting were performed using Qualtrics electronic survey software.
Participants
Adults with PG, healthcare professionals, researchers, and industry representatives.
Findings
Collaborative discussions and systematic review yielded 115 items, which were distilled into 15 prospective domains. The eDelphi exercise removed three lowest priority domains (Laboratory Tests, Treatment Costs, and Disease Impact on Family) and ranked Pain, Quality of Life, and Physical Symptoms as the highest priority prospective domains. Consensus was reached on the domains of Pain, Quality of Life, and Clinical Signs.
The domain of disease course/disease progression narrowly failed to reach consensus for inclusion in the core set (32.2% of participants voted no). Refinement of this domain definition will be required and presented for consideration at future consensus meetings.
Conclusions and Relevance
The UPGRADE Core Domain Set for PG clinical trials has been agreed by international multi-stakeholder consensus. Future work will develop and/or select outcome measurement instruments for these domains to establish a core outcome set.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|