A systematic review of stigma in sexual and gender minority health interventions

Author:

Layland Eric K1ORCID,Carter Joseph A23,Perry Nicholas S45,Cienfuegos-Szalay Jorge23,Nelson Kimberly M6,Bonner Courtney Peasant7,Rendina H Jonathon23

Affiliation:

1. Human Development and Family Studies Department, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA

2. Department of Psychology, Hunter College, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA

3. Health Psychology and Clinical Science PhD Program, The Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA

4. Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA

5. Centers for Behavioral and Preventive Medicine, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI, USA

6. School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA

7. Substance Use, Gender, and Applied Research Program, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA

Abstract

AbstractStigma against sexual and gender minorities is a major driver of health disparities. Psychological and behavioral interventions that do not address the stigma experienced by sexual and gender minorities may be less efficacious. We conducted a systematic review of existing psychological and behavioral health interventions for sexual and gender minorities to investigate how interventions target sexual and gender minority stigma and consider how stigma could affect intervention efficacy. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Eligible studies were peer reviewed and published in English between January 2003 and July 2019 and reported empirical results of behavioral or psychological interventions implemented among sexual and gender minorities. All interventions addressed stigma. We identified 37 eligible interventions. Most interventions targeted sexual minority men. Interventions were frequently developed or adapted for implementation among sexual and gender minorities and addressed multiple levels and types of stigma. Interventions most frequently targeted proximal stressors, including internalized and anticipated stigma. HIV and mental health were the most commonly targeted health outcomes. A limited number of studies investigated the moderating or mediating effects of stigma on intervention efficacy. The application of an intersectional framework was frequently absent and rarely amounted to addressing sources of stigma beyond sexual and gender minority identities. A growing number of interventions address sexual and gender minority stigma in an effort to prevent deleterious health effects. Future research is needed to assess whether stigma modifies the effectiveness of existing psychological and behavioral interventions among sexual and gender minorities. Further, the application of intersectional frameworks is needed to more comprehensively intervene on multiple, intersecting sources of stigma faced by the diverse sexual and gender minority community.

Funder

National Institute on Drug Abuse

Hunter College

National Institute of Mental Health

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Behavioral Neuroscience,Applied Psychology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3