Psychological Response to the Diagnosis of Advanced Cancer: A Systematic Review

Abstract

Abstract Background Despite major efforts to address psychological distress and quality of life (QOL) in people with cancer, only none to small intervention effect has been observed. There is reason to question whether psychosocial needs of patients have already been met under the usual oncology care. Purpose The purpose of this systematic review was to examine changes in depression, anxiety and QOL during the existential plight in advanced cancer. Methods A literature search was performed in the PubMed and APA PsycINFO databases from year 1976 up to May 31, 2021. Longitudinal observational or experimental research targeting depression, anxiety or QOL in advanced cancer (stage III or IV), with baseline time since cancer diagnosis within 100 days, follow-up within 16 weeks post-baseline were eligible. Quality rating was based on the GRADE guidelines. Results Overall QOL did not reveal clinically relevant changes for the majority of studies as evaluated by effect size and raw score changes (median effect size 0.01, interquartile range −0.10–0.15). Nonetheless, modest to moderate improvement was found for depression (median effect size 0.28, interquartile range 0.03–0.38) and anxiety (median effect size 0.57, interquartile range 0.32–0.79). Conclusion Transient distress symptoms and temporarily reduced functioning in the oncology setting may be considered normal, whereas impaired overall QOL needs to be addressed. Developing innovative interventions that enhance QOL for patients newly diagnosed with advanced cancer without interfering with patients’ natural adaptation process is imperative.