The effectiveness of digital interventions for self-management of chronic pain in employment settings: a systematic review

Author:

Blake Holly12ORCID,Chaplin Wendy J134ORCID,Gupta Alisha56

Affiliation:

1. School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham , Queen’s Medical Centre, Derby Road, Nottingham, NG7 2HA , UK

2. NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Medical School, Queen’s Medical Centre , Derby Road, Nottingham, NG7 2UH , UK

3. NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre , Medical School, , Derby Road, Nottingham, NG7 2UH , UK

4. Queen’s Medical Centre , Medical School, , Derby Road, Nottingham, NG7 2UH , UK

5. Population Health Sciences Institute , Baddiley-Clark Building, , Newcastleupon-Tyne, NE1 7RU , UK

6. Newcastle University , Baddiley-Clark Building, , Newcastleupon-Tyne, NE1 7RU , UK

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Chronic pain affects over a quarter of the workforce with high economic burden for individuals, employers and healthcare services. Access to work-related advice for people with chronic pain is variable. This systematic review aims to explore the effectiveness of workplace-delivered digital interventions for the self-management of chronic pain. Source of data MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Library, JBI, Open Science Framework, Epistemonikos and Google Scholar. Articles published between January 2001 and December 2023 were included. Searches were conducted between October 2023 and December 2023. Areas of agreement Workplace-delivered digital interventions to support self-management of chronic pain at work may improve pain and health-related quality of life in vocationally active adults. Delivering interventions outside of clinical services, through the workplace setting, may help to reduce inequity in access to work-related advice for people with chronic pain, and ultimately reduce the burden on individuals, employers and healthcare services. Interventions include mobile apps and web-based programmes. Areas of controversy Studies were moderate-to-low quality. Most studies focused on exercise, few considered other aspects of pain self-management. Given the limited evidence in the current literature, consensus on best intervention format and delivery is lacking. Growing points More high-quality studies are needed given the heterogeneity in study design, interventions and outcome measures. Areas timely for developing research No interventions included advice on work-related adjustments or support. Few studies included work-related outcomes, despite the known impact of pain on work and work on health.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3