Abstract
Abstract
We study quantitatively the optimality of quarantine and testing policies; and whether they are complements or substitutes. We extend the epidemiological susceptible-exposed-infectious-recovered model to incorporate an information friction. Our main finding is that testing is a cost-efficient substitute for lockdowns, rendering them almost unnecessary. By identifying carriers, testing contains the spread of the virus without reducing output, although the implementation requires widespread massive testing. As a byproduct, we show that two distinct optimal lockdown policy types arise: suppression, intended to eliminate the virus, and mitigation, concerned about flattening the curve. The choice between them is determined by a ‘hope-for-the-cure’ effect, arising due to either an expected vaccine or the belief that the virus can be eliminated. Conditional on the policy type, the intensity and duration of the intervention is invariant to both the trade-off between lives and output and the aversion to GDP variations: the optimal intervention path depends mostly on the virus dynamics.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Reference41 articles.
1. ‘Optimal targeted lockdowns in a multigroup sir model’;Acemoglu;American Economic Review: Insights,2021
2. ‘A simple planning problem for COVID-19 lock-down, testing, and tracing’;Alvarez;American Economic Review: Insights,2021
3. ‘The hammer and the dance: Equilibrium and optimal policy during a pandemic crisis’;Assenza,2020
4. ‘What will be the economic impact of COVID-19 in the US? Rough estimates of disease scenarios’;Atkeson,2020
5. ‘Economic benefits of COVID-19 screening tests’;Atkeson,2020
Cited by
34 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献