Affiliation:
1. Universidad Carlos III de Madrid , Spain
2. CEPR , UK
3. Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile , Chile
4. ISCI , Chile
Abstract
Abstract
An imperfectly informed regulator needs to procure multiple units of some good (e.g., green energy, market liquidity, pollution reduction, land conservation) that can be produced with heterogeneous technologies at various costs. How should she optimally procure these units? Should she run technology-specific or technology-neutral auctions? Should she allow for partial separation across technologies? Should she instead post separate prices for each technology? What are the trade-offs involved? We find that one size does not fit all: the preferred instrument depends on the costs of the available technologies, their degree of substitutability, the extent of information asymmetry and the costs of public funds. We illustrate the use of our theory for policy analysis with an ex ante evaluation of Spain’s recent renewable auction.
Funder
European Research Council
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Reference28 articles.
1. ‘Expecting the unexpected: Emissions uncertainty and environmental market design’;Borenstein;American Economic Review,2019
2. ‘The simple economics of optimal auctions’;Bulow;Journal of Political Economy,1989
3. ‘Communication from the commission: Guidelines on state aid for environmental protection and energy 2014-2020’;European Commission;Official Journal of the European Union,2014
4. ‘Designing electricity auctions’;Fabra;RAND Journal of Economics,2006
5. ‘The renewable energy auction revolution, energy institute blog’;Fowlie,2017
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献