Inferring Risk Perceptions and Preferences Using Choice from Insurance Menus: Theory and Evidence

Author:

Ericson Keith Marzilli1,Kircher Philipp2,Spinnewijn Johannes3,Starc Amanda4

Affiliation:

1. Boston University Questrom School of Business, USA

2. University of Edinburgh, Belgium

3. London School of Economics, UK

4. Kellogg School of Management, USA

Abstract

Abstract Demand for insurance can be driven by high risk aversion or high-risk. We show how to separately identify risk preferences and risk types using only choices from menus of insurance plans. Our revealed preference approach does not rely on rational expectations, nor does it require access to claims data. We show what can be learned non-parametrically about the type distributions from variation in insurance plans, offered separately to random cross-sections or offered as part of the same menu to one cross-section. We prove that our approach allows for full identification in the textbook model with binary risks, and extend our results to continuous risks. We illustrate our approach using the Massachusetts Health Insurance Exchange, where choices provide informative bounds on the type distributions, especially for risks, but do not allow us to reject homogeneity in preferences.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Economics and Econometrics

Reference67 articles.

1. ‘Choice inconsistencies among the elderly: evidence from plan choice in the Medicare Part D program’;Abaluck;American Economic Review,2011

2. ‘Consume now or later? Time inconsistency, collective choice, and revealed preference’;Adams;American Economic Review,2014

3. ‘The analysis of field choice in college and graduate school: determinants and wage effects’;Altonji,2016

4. ‘Nonidentification of insurance models with probability of accidents’;Aryal,2012

5. ‘Identification of insurance models with multidimensional screening’;Aryal,2016

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3