Affiliation:
1. Nanjing Audit University
2. University of Technology Sydney
Abstract
Abstract
This article investigates how a privately informed seller could signal her type through Bayesian persuasion and pricing strategy. We find that it is generally impossible to achieve separation through one channel alone. Furthermore, the outcome that survives the intuitive criterion always exists and is unique. This outcome is separating, for which a closed-form solution is provided. The signalling concern forces the high-type seller to disclose inefficiently more information and charge a higher price, resulting in fewer sales and lower profit. Finally, we show that a regulation on minimal quality could potentially hurt social welfare, and private information hurts the seller.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Reference39 articles.
1. ‘Persuading voters’;Alonso;American Economic Review,2016
2. ‘Political disagreement and information in elections’;Alonso;Games and Economic Behavior,2016
3. ‘On the value of persuasion by experts’;Alonso;Journal of Economic Theory,2018
4. ‘Advertising content’;Anderson;American Economic Review,2006
5. ‘Competitive disclosure of correlated information’;Au;Economic Theory,2017
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献