Anisogamy and the Darwin–Bateman paradigm

Author:

Janicke Tim1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. CEFE, University of Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD , Montpellier , France

Abstract

Abstract The Darwin–Bateman paradigm advanced as the central concept to explain the evolutionary origin of sex differences. However, debates regarding its theoretical underpinnings persist, particularly with respect to the role of anisogamy in sexual selection. The theoretical work presented by Lehtonen and Parker suggests that the initial split in gamete production rate drives sex differences in sexual selection but that any further variation in the degree of anisogamy is not expected to alter the strength of sexual selection in males and females. Here, I discuss the historical background of a recently emerged controversy and present empirical data that corroborate the theoretical predictions. Lehtonen and Parker’s contribution refines our understanding of the Darwin–Bateman paradigm by providing a broad theory for large-scale patterns of sex differences that can be observed in nature. Further understanding of how demographic and environmental factors influence sexual selection is essential to predict the vast diversity of sex differences across the tree of life, beyond the primordial impact of anisogamy.

Funder

CNRS

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference24 articles.

1. A matter of time: Bateman’s principles and mating success as count and duration across social strata in contemporary Finland;Andersson;Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences,2023

2. Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila;Bateman;Heredity,1948

3. Intensity of sexual selection along the anisogamy-isogamy continuum;Bjork;Nature,2006

4. The combined effects of pre- and post-copulatory processes are masking sexual conflict over mating rate in Gerris buenoi;Devost;Journal of Evolutionary Biology,2016

5. The Darwin-Bateman paradigm in historical context;Dewsbury;Integrative and Comparative Biology,2005

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3