Are interventions in reproductive medicine assessed for plausible and clinically relevant effects? A systematic review of power and precision in trials and meta-analyses-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Are interventions in reproductive medicine assessed for plausible and clinically relevant effects? A systematic review of power and precision in trials and meta-analyses

Published:2019-03-06 Issue:4 Volume:34 Page:659-665
ISSN:0268-1161
Container-title:Human Reproduction
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Stocking K¹²,Wilkinson J²^ORCID,Lensen S³⁴,Brison D R⁵⁶,Roberts S A²,Vail A²

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medical Statistics, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK

2. Centre for Biostatistics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland, New Zealand

4. Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK

5. Department of Reproductive Medicine, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK

6. Maternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, UK

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynaecology,Rehabilitation,Reproductive Medicine

Link

http://academic.oup.com/humrep/article-pdf/34/4/659/28257564/dez017.pdf

Reference31 articles.

1. Biases in electronic health record data due to processes within the healthcare system: retrospective observational study;Agniel;BMJ,2018

2. Statistics and ethics in medical research;Altman;Misuse of statistics is unethical. Br Med J,1980

3. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence;Altman;BMJ,1995

4. Confidence intervals illuminate absence of evidence;Altman;BMJ,2004

5. Time‐lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction;Armstrong;Cochrane Database Sys Rev,2015

Cited by 28 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Diagnostic or prognostic? Decoding the role of embryo selection on in vitro fertilization treatment outcomes;Fertility and Sterility;2024-05

2. Impact factor bias in randomized controlled trials in reproductive medicine;Fertility and Sterility;2023-09

3. Endometrial Scratching for Improving Endometrial Receptivity: a Critical Review of Old and New Clinical Evidence;Reproductive Sciences;2022-12-05

4. Evidence in reproductive medicine;Reproductive and Developmental Medicine;2022-09

5. Surveys of clinician and patient attitudes to an add‐on for in vitro fertilisation;Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology;2022-06-21