Trends in time-to-pregnancy in the USA: 2002 to 2017

Author:

Eisenberg Michael L1ORCID,Thoma Marie E2,Li Shufeng1,McLain Alexander C3

Affiliation:

1. Male Reproductive Medicine and Surgery, Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA

2. Department of Family Science, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA

3. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA

Abstract

Abstract STUDY QUESTION Has there been there a temporal change in time-to-pregnancy (TTP) in the USA. SUMMARY ANSWER Overall, TTP was stable over time, but a longer TTP for women over 30 and parous women was identified. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Fertility rates in the USA have declined over the past several years. Although these trends have been attributed to changing reproductive intentions, it is unclear whether declining fecundity (the biologic ability to reproduce measured by TTP in the current report) may also play a role. Indeed, trends based on declining sperm quality and higher utilisation of infertility treatment suggest fecundity may be falling. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This cross-sectional survey data from the National Survey of Family Growth was administered from 2002 to 2017. The surveys are based on nationally representative samples of reproductive-aged women in the USA. Interviews were conducted in person or through computer-assisted self-administration of sensitive questions. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS The study included women who self-reported time spent trying to become pregnant allowing utilisation of the current duration approach to estimate the total duration of pregnancy attempt (i.e. TTP). In all, 1202 participants were analysed over each study period. To estimate a TTP distribution overall and by parity, we used a piecewise constant proportional hazards model that accounts for digit preference. Accelerated-failure-time regression models, which were weighted to account for the sampling design, were used to estimate time ratios (TRs). Models were adjusted for age, BMI, race, education, relationship status, parity, pelvic inflammatory disease treatment and any reproductive problems. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Of the participants analysed, the average age was 31.8 and BMI was 28.6, which was similar across the survey periods. Relationship status was the only demographic characteristic that changed over time. All other variables remained constant across the study periods. Overall, TRs comparing TTP between 2002 and 2017 increased slightly (TR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.99, 1.04). When stratified by parity, parous women had a longer TTP over the later years of the study (TR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.06). TTP remained constant for nulliparous women. Similarly, TTP also increased over time for women over age thirty (TR: 1.02, 1.00, 1.05) but not for women under age thirty. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Small changes in data collection over time may have impacted the findings. We accounted for this in sensitivity analyses using imputed data. Overall, TRs were slightly attenuated using the imputed data, but represented similar patterns to the original data. Results for parous women and women over 30 remained consistent in the sensitivity analyses. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Consistent with reports of falling fertility rates and sperm counts, this study suggests parous and older couples in the USA may be taking longer to become pregnant. Although trends were suggestive of a small overall increase in TTP, particularly for parous women and women over age thirty, additional data are needed to attempt to understand these trends given the societal, economic and public health implications related to fecundity. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) Funding was provided by National Institutes of Health grant R03HD097287 to A.C.M. There are no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.

Funder

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Rehabilitation,Reproductive Medicine

Reference41 articles.

1. The challenge and enjoyment of the interpretation of epidemiologic data;Barnhart;Fertil Steril,2006

2. Heavy metals and couple fecundity, the LIFE Study;Buck Louis;Chemosphere,2012

3. Infertility and impaired fecundity in the United States, 1982-2010: data from the National Survey of Family Growth;Chandra;Natl Health Stat Rep,2013

4. Validity of self-reported time to pregnancy;Cooney;Epidemiology,2009

5. Cumulative incidence rate of medical consultation for fecundity problems–analysis of a prevalent cohort using competing risks;Duron;Hum Reprod,2013

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3