Preimplantation genetic testing and child health: a national register-based study
Author:
Ginström Ernstad Erica1ORCID, Hanson Charles2, Wånggren Kjell3, Thurin-Kjellberg Ann2, Hulthe Söderberg Cecilia4, Syk Lundberg Elisabeth56, Petzold Max7, Wennerholm Ulla-Britt1, Bergh Christina2
Affiliation:
1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, East Hospital, Sahlgrenska University Hospital , Gothenburg, Sweden 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Reproductive Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital , Gothenburg, Sweden 3. Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm, Sweden 4. Department of Clinical Genetics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital , Gothenburg, Sweden 5. Department of Clinical Genetics, Karolinska University Hospital , Stockholm, Sweden 6. Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Centre for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm, Sweden 7. School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg , Sweden
Abstract
AbstractSTUDY QUESTIONIs preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) associated with adverse perinatal outcome and early childhood health?SUMMARY ANSWERChildren born after PGT had comparable perinatal outcomes to children born after IVF/ICSI and comparable findings regarding early childhood health.WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADYPGT is offered to couples affected by monogenic disorders (PGT-M) or inherited chromosomal aberrations (PGT-SR), limiting the risk of transferring the disorder to the offspring. PGT, an invasive technique, requires genetic analysis of one or up to ten cells from the embryo and is combined with IVF or ICSI. Several studies, most of them small, have shown comparable results after PGT and IVF/ICSI concerning perinatal outcome. Only a few studies with limited samples have been published on PGT and childhood health.STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATIONWe performed a register-based study including all singletons born after PGT (n = 390) in Sweden during 1 January 1996–30 September 2019. Singletons born after PGT were compared with all singletons born after IVF/ICSI (n = 61 060) born during the same period of time and with a matched sample of singletons (n = 42 034) born after spontaneous conception selected from the Medical Birth Register. Perinatal outcomes, early childhood health, and maternal outcomes were compared between pregnancies after PGT and IVF/ICSI as well as between pregnancies after PGT and spontaneous conception. Primary outcomes were preterm birth (PTB) and low birthweight (LBW) whereas childhood morbidity was the secondary outcome.PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODSData on women who went through PGT and gave birth were obtained from the local databases at the two PGT centres in Sweden, whereas data on IVF treatment for the IVF/ICSI group were obtained from the national IVF registers. These data were then cross-linked to national health registers; the Medical Birth Register, the Patient Register, and the Cause of Death Register. Logistic multivariable regression analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were performed with adjustment for relevant confounders.MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCEThe mean follow-up time was 4.6 years for children born after PGT and 5.1 years for children born after spontaneous conception, whereas the mean follow-up time was 9.0 years for children born after IVF/ICSI. For perinatal outcomes, PTB occurred in 7.7% of children after PGT and in 7.3% of children after IVF/ICSI, whereas the rates were 4.9% and 5.2% for LBW (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.22, 95% CI 0.82–1.81 and AOR 1.17, 95% CI 0.71–1.91, respectively). No differences were observed for birth defects. In comparison to spontaneous conception, children born after PGT had a higher risk for PTB (AOR 1.73, 95% CI 1.17–2.58). Regarding early childhood health, the absolute risk of asthma was 38/390 (9.7%) in children born after PGT and 6980/61 060 (11.4%) in children born after in IVF/ICSI, whereas the corresponding numbers were 34/390 (8.7%) and 7505/61 060 (12.3%) for allergic disorders. Following Cox proportional hazards models, no significant differences were found for these outcomes. Sepsis, hypothyroidism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, autism spectrum disorders, mental retardation, cerebral palsy, and epilepsy were diagnosed in a maximum of three PGT children. No PGT children died during the follow-up period. Regarding maternal outcomes, the rates of placenta praevia and caesarean delivery were significantly higher after PGT in comparison to spontaneous conception (AOR 6.46, 95% CI 3.38–12.37 and AOR 1.52, 95% CI 1.20–1.92, respectively), whereas no differences were seen comparing pregnancies after PGT and IVF/ICSI.LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTIONThe rather small sample size of children born after PGT made it impossible to adjust for all relevant confounders including fertilization method and culture duration. Moreover, the follow-up time was short for most of the children especially in the PGT group, probably lowering the absolute number of diagnoses in early childhood.WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGSThe results are reassuring and indicate that the embryo biopsy itself has no adverse effect on the perinatal, early childhood, or maternal outcomes. Although the results are comparable to IVF/ICSI also regarding early childhood outcome, they should be taken with caution due to the low number of children with diagnoses and short follow-up time. Long-term follow-up studies on children born after PGT are scarce and should be conducted considering the invasiveness of the technique.STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)The study was financed by grants from the Swedish state under the agreement between the Swedish government and the county councils, the ALF-agreement (LUA/ALF 70940), the Board of National Specialised Medical Care at Sahlgrenska University Hospital and Hjalmar Svensson Research Foundation. There are no conflicts of interest to declare.TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERN/A.
Funder
Swedish government
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology,Rehabilitation,Reproductive Medicine
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|