Blastocyst quality and reproductive and perinatal outcomes: a multinational multicentre observational study

Author:

Zou Haowen1ORCID,Kemper James M12ORCID,Hammond Elizabeth R3,Xu Fengqin4,Liu Gensheng5,Xue Lintao6,Bai Xiaohong7,Liao Hongqing8,Xue Songguo9,Zhao Shuqin10,Xia Lan11,Scott Jean12,Chapple Vincent13,Afnan Masoud14,Morbeck Dean E1315ORCID,Mol Ben W J1216,Liu Yanhe13171819ORCID,Wang Rui1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University , Clayton, Australia

2. Monash Women’s, Monash Health , Clayton, Australia

3. Fertility Associates , Auckland, New Zealand

4. Department of Reproductive Medicine, Tianjin First Central Hospital , Tianjin, China

5. Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Tianjin Aiwei Hospital , Tianjin, China

6. Reproductive Medical and Genetic Center, People’s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region , Nanning, China

7. Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital , Tianjin, China

8. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hengyang Medical School, South China University , Hengyang, China

9. Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shanghai East Hospital , Shanghai, China

10. Center for Reproductive Medicine, Zaozhuang Marternal and Child Health Center , Zaozhuang, China

11. Reproductive Medical Center of Ruijin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University , Shanghai, China

12. Fertility Solutions , Sunshine Coast, Australia

13. Fertility North , Joondalup, Australia

14. Qingdao United Family Hospital , Qingdao, China

15. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland , Auckland, New Zealand

16. Aberdeen Centre for Women’s Health Research, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen , Aberdeen, UK

17. School of Human Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley , Australia

18. School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University , Joondalup, Australia

19. Bond University , Robina, Australia

Abstract

Abstract STUDY QUESTION Does the transfer of single low-grade blastocysts result in acceptable reproductive and perinatal outcomes compared to the transfer of single good-grade blastocysts? SUMMARY ANSWER The transfer of single low-grade blastocysts resulted in a reduced live birth rate of around 30% (14% for very low-grade blastocysts) compared to 44% for single good-grade blastocysts, but does not lead to more adverse perinatal outcomes. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY It is known that low-grade blastocysts can result in live births. However, the current studies are limited by relatively small sample sizes and single-centre designs. Furthermore, evidence on perinatal outcomes after transferring low-grade blastocysts is limited. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION We conducted a multi-centre, multi-national retrospective cohort study of 10 018 women undergoing 10 964 single blastocyst transfer cycles between 2009 and 2020 from 14 clinics across Australia, China, and New Zealand. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Blastocysts were graded individually based on assessment of the morphology and development of the inner cell mass (ICM) and trophectoderm (TE), and were grouped into three quality categories: good- (AB, AB, or BA), moderate- (BB), and low-grade (grade C for ICM or TE) blastocysts. CC blastocysts were individually grouped as very low-grade blastocysts. Logistic regression with generalized estimating equation was used to analyse the association between blastocyst quality and live birth as well as other reproductive outcomes. Binomial, multinomial logistic, or linear regression was used to investigate the association between blastocyst quality and perinatal outcomes. Odds ratio (OR), adjusted OR (aOR), adjusted regression coefficient, and their 95% CIs are presented. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE There were 4386 good-grade blastocysts, 3735 moderate-grade blastocysts, and 2843 low-grade blastocysts were included in the analysis, for which the live birth rates were 44.4%, 38.6%, and 30.2%, respectively. Compared to good-grade blastocysts, the live birth rate of low-grade blastocysts was significantly lower (aOR of 0.48 (0.41–0.55)). Very low-grade blastocysts were associated with an even lower live birth rate (aOR 0.30 (0.18–0.52)) and their absolute live birth rate was 13.7%. There were 4132 singleton live births included in the analysis of perinatal outcomes. Compared with good-grade blastocysts, low-grade blastocysts had comparable preterm birth rates (<37 weeks, aOR 1.00 (0.65–1.54)), birthweight Z-scores (adjusted regression coefficient 0.02 (0.09–0.14)), and rates of very low birth weight (<1500 g, aOR 0.84 (0.22–3.25)), low birth weight (1500–2500 g, aOR 0.96 (0.56–1.65)), high birth weight (>4500 g, aOR 0.93 (0.37–2.32)), small for gestational age (aOR 1.63 (0.91–2.93)), and large for gestational age (aOR 1.28 (0.97–1.70)). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Due to the nature of the retrospective design, residual confounding could not be excluded. In addition, the number of events for some perinatal outcomes was small. Between-operator and between-laboratory variations in blastocyst assessment were difficult to control. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Patients undergoing IVF should be informed that low-grade blastocysts result in a lower live birth rate, however they do not increase the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. Further research should focus on the criteria for embryos that should not be transferred and on the follow-up of long-term outcomes of offspring. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) H.Z. is supported by a Monash Research Scholarship. B.W.J.M. is supported by a NHMRC Investigator grant (GNT1176437). R.W. is supported by an NHMRC Emerging Leadership Investigator grant (2009767). B.W.J.M. reports consultancy, travel support, and research funding from Merck. The other authors do not have competing interests to disclose. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.

Funder

Monash Research Scholarship

NHMRC

NHMRC Emerging Leadership Investigator

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Rehabilitation,Reproductive Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3