Chance of live birth: a nationwide, registry-based cohort study

Author:

Kolte Astrid M12,Westergaard David134,Lidegaard Øjvind25,Brunak Søren3,Nielsen Henriette Svarre126

Affiliation:

1. Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Unit, Capital Region, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Fertility Clinic 4071, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, and Hvidovre Hospital, 2650 Hvidovre, Denmark

2. Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark

3. Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark

4. Methods and Analysis, Statistics Denmark, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark

5. Department of Gynaecology 4232, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark

6. Department of Gynaecology-and-Obstetrics, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre Hospital, 2650 Hvidovre, Denmark

Abstract

Abstract STUDY QUESTION Does the sequence of prior pregnancy events (pregnancy losses, live births, ectopic pregnancies, molar pregnancy and still birth), obstetric complications and maternal age affect chance of live birth in the next pregnancy and are prior events predictive for the outcome? SUMMARY ANSWER The sequence of pregnancy outcomes is significantly associated with chance of live birth; however, pregnancy history and age are insufficient to predict the outcome of an individual woman’s next pregnancy. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Adverse pregnancy outcomes decrease the chance of live birth in the next pregnancy, whereas the impact of prior live births is less clear. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION Nationwide, registry-based cohort study of 1 285 230 women with a total of 2 722 441 pregnancies from 1977 to 2017. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS All women living in Denmark in the study period with at least one pregnancy in either the Danish Medical Birth Registry or the Danish National Patient Registry. Data were analysed using logistic regression with a robust covariance model to account for women with more than one pregnancy. Model discrimination and calibration were ascertained using 20% of the women in the cohort randomly selected as an internal validation set. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Obstetric complications, still birth, ectopic pregnancies and pregnancy losses had a negative effect on the chance of live birth in the next pregnancy. Consecutive, identical pregnancy outcomes (pregnancy losses, live births or ectopic pregnancies) immediately preceding the next pregnancy had a larger impact than the total number of any outcome. Model discrimination was modest (C-index = 0.60, positive predictive value = 0.45), but the models were well calibrated. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION While prior pregnancy outcomes and their sequence significantly influenced the chance of live birth, the discriminative abilities of the predictive models demonstrate clearly that pregnancy history and maternal age are insufficient to reliably predict the outcome of a given pregnancy. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Prior pregnancy history has a significant impact on the chance of live birth in the next pregnancy. However, the results emphasize that only taking age and number of losses into account does not predict if a pregnancy will end as a live birth or not. A better understanding of biological determinants for pregnancy outcomes is urgently needed. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) The work was supported by the Novo Nordisk Foundation, Ole Kirk Foundation and Rigshospitalet’s Research Foundation. The authors have no financial relationships that could appear to have influenced the work. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.

Funder

Novo Nordisk Foundation

Ole Kirk Foundation

Rigshospitalet’s Research Fund

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Rehabilitation,Reproductive Medicine

Reference45 articles.

1. Cumulative incidence of previous spontaneous abortion in Sweden in 1983-2003: a register study;Adolfsson;Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand,2006

2. Pregnancy loss and risk of later dementia: a nationwide cohort study, Denmark, 1977-2017;Basit;Alzheimers Dementia,2019

3. ESHRE guideline: recurrent pregnancy loss;Bender Atik;Hum Reprod Open,2018

4. Recurrent miscarriage: are three miscarriages one too many? Analysis of a Scottish population-based database of 151,021 pregnancies;Bhattacharya;Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,2010

5. The Danish Medical Birth Register;Bliddal;Eur J Epidemiol,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3