Confounding and effect measure modification in reproductive medicine research

Author:

Correia Katharine FB1,Dodge Laura E234,Farland Leslie V5,Hacker Michele R234,Ginsburg Elizabeth6,Whitcomb Brian W7ORCID,Wise Lauren A8,Missmer Stacey A49

Affiliation:

1. Department of Mathematics & Statistics, Amherst College, Amherst, MA, USA

2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA

3. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

4. Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA

5. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA

6. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

7. Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA

8. Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA

9. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, MI, USA

Abstract

Abstract The majority of research within reproductive and gynecologic health, or investigating ART, is observational in design. One of the most critical challenges for observational studies is confounding, while one of the most important for discovery and inference is effect modification. In this commentary, we explain what confounding and effect modification are and why they matter. We present examples illustrating how failing to adjust for a confounder leads to invalid conclusions, as well as examples where adjusting for a factor that is not a confounder also leads to invalid or imprecise conclusions. Careful consideration of which factors may act as confounders or modifiers of the association of interest is critical to conducting sound research, particularly with complex observational studies in reproductive medicine.

Funder

NIH

2 L50

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Rehabilitation,Reproductive Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3