Reply: ‘One-stop shop’ ultrasound evaluation of an infertile patient: doing less is no longer an option-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Reply: ‘One-stop shop’ ultrasound evaluation of an infertile patient: doing less is no longer an option

Published:2022-06-17 Issue:8 Volume:37 Page:1953-1954
ISSN:0268-1161
Container-title:Human Reproduction
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

van Welie Nienke¹^ORCID,van Rijswijk Joukje¹,Dreyer Kim¹,Mol Ben Willem²³,Mijatovic Velja¹

Affiliation:

1. Department of Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute , Amsterdam, the Netherlands

2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University , Clayton, VIC, Australia

3. Aberdeen Centre for Women's Health Research, University of Aberdeen, King's College , Aberdeen, UK

Funder

Netherlands organization for Health Research and Development

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Rehabilitation,Reproductive Medicine

Link

https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article-pdf/37/8/1953/45197777/deac133.pdf

Reference5 articles.

1. Oil-based or water-based contrast for hysterosalpingography in infertile women;Dreyer;N Engl J Med,2017

2. Oil-based versus water-based contrast for hysterosalpingography in infertile women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials;Fang;Fertil Steril,2018

3. ‘One-stop shop’ultrasound evaluation of an infertile patients: doing less is no longer an option;Melcer;Hum Reprod,2022

4. Effectiveness on fertility outcome of tubal flushing with different contrast media: systematic review and network meta-analysis;Wang;Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2019

5. Tubal flushing for subfertility;Wang;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2020