Affiliation:
1. INSERM UMR 1153, Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé), Center for Epidemiology and Statistics, Sorbonne Paris Cité (CRESS), DHU Risks in Pregnancy, Paris Descartes University, F-75004 Paris, France
2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre hospitalier général de Saint-Denis, Saint-Denis, France
3. Department of General Pediatrics and Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Necker-Enfants malades Hospital, APHP, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
Abstract
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION
Is there an association between advanced paternal age and congenital heart defects (CHD)?
SUMMARY ANSWER
Advanced paternal age is associated with a 16% increase in the overall odds of CHD.
WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY
CHD are the most common congenital malformations. Several risk factors for CHD have been identified in the literature, but the association between advanced paternal age and CHD remains unclear.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION
We conducted a systematic literature search on MEDLINE and EMBASE (1960–2019) to identify studies assessing the association between advanced paternal age (≥35 years) and the risk of CHD, unrestrictive of language or sample size. We used a combination of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and free text words such as ‘paternal age’, ‘paternal factors’, ‘father’s age’, ‘parental age’, ‘heart’, ‘cardiac’, ‘cardiovascular’, ‘abnormalities, congenital’, ‘birth defects’, ‘congenital malformations’ and ‘congenital abnormalities’.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS
We included observational studies aiming at assessing the association between paternal age and CHD. The included population could be live births, fetal deaths and terminations of pregnancy for fetal anomaly. To be included, studies had to provide either odds ratios (OR) with their 95% confidence interval (CI) or sufficient information to recalculate ORs with 95% CIs per paternal age category. We excluded studies if they had no comparative group and if they were reviews or case reports. Two independent reviewers selected the studies, extracted the data and assessed risk of bias using a modified Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. We used random-effects meta-analysis to produce summary estimates of crude OR. Associations were also tested in subgroups.
MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE
Of 191 studies identified, we included nine studies in the meta-analysis (9 917 011 participants, including 34 447 CHD), including four population-based studies. Five studies were judged at low risk of bias. Only one population-based study specifically investigated isolated CHD. The risk of CHD was higher with advanced paternal age (summary OR 1.16, 95% CI, 1.07–1.25). Effect sizes were stable in population-based studies and in those with low risk of bias.
LIMITATIONS AND REASONS FOR CAUTION
The available evidence did not allow to assess (i) the risk of isolated CHD in population-based studies, (ii) the association between paternal age and the risk for specific CHD and (iii) the association between paternal age and CHD after adjustment for other risk factors, such as maternal age.
WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS
Our findings suggest that advanced paternal age may be a risk factor for CHD. However, because the association is modest in magnitude, its usefulness as a criterion for targeted screening for CHD seems limited.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)
None.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42019135061.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology,Rehabilitation,Reproductive Medicine
Reference66 articles.
1. Profile and risk factors for congenital heart defects: a study in a tertiary care hospital;Abqari;Ann Pediatr Cardiol,2016
2. Association of paternal age with prevalence of selected birth defects;Archer;Birt Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol,2007
3. [Prevalence of congenital heart disease in 44,985 newborns in Colombia];Baltaxe;Arch Cardiol Mex,2006
4. Risk factors for congenital heart diseases in Alexandria, Egypt;Bassili;Eur J Epidemiol,2000