Cost-effectiveness of a mild compared with a standard strategy for IVF: a randomized comparison using cumulative term live birth as the primary endpoint-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Cost-effectiveness of a mild compared with a standard strategy for IVF: a randomized comparison using cumulative term live birth as the primary endpoint

Published:2007-12-14 Issue:2 Volume:23 Page:316-323
ISSN:0268-1161
Container-title:Human Reproduction
language:en
Short-container-title:Human Reproduction

Author:

Polinder S.,Heijnen E.M.E.W.,Macklon N.S.,Habbema J.D.F.,Fauser B.J.C.M.,Eijkemans M.J.C.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynaecology,Rehabilitation,Reproductive Medicine

Link

http://academic.oup.com/humrep/article-pdf/23/2/316/1746201/dem372.pdf

Cited by 61 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Setting a tariff for IVF and ICSI treatment: a cost analysis;Human Fertility;2023-05-27

2. Valuing infertility treatment: Why QALYs are inadequate, and an alternative approach to cost-effectiveness thresholds;Frontiers in Medical Technology;2022-12-23

3. Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Minimal Ovarian Stimulation in-vitro Fertilization versus Conventional Ovarian Stimulation in Poor Responders: Economic Evaluation Alongside a Propensity Score Adjusted Prospective Observational Study;JBRA Assisted Reproduction;2022

4. Restraint stress and elevation of corticotrophin-releasing hormone in female mice impair oocyte competence through activation of the tumour necrosis factor α (TNF-α) system;Reproduction, Fertility and Development;2020

5. Success rates in minimal stimulation cycle IVF with clomiphene citrate only;Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics;2019-12-23