Effects of trying to conceive using an every-other-day strategy versus fertile window monitoring on stress: a 12-month randomized controlled trial

Author:

Martins Mariana V12ORCID,Fernandes Joana12ORCID,Pedro Juliana23ORCID,Barros Alberto34,Xavier Pedro35,Schmidt Lone6ORCID,Costa Maria E12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto , Porto, Portugal

2. Centre for Psychology at University of Porto , Porto, Portugal

3. Centre for Reproductive Genetics A. Barros , Porto, Portugal

4. Department of Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Institute of Health Research and Innovation I3S , Porto, Portugal

5. Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, São João Hospital, University of Porto , Porto, Portugal

6. Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen K, Denmark

Abstract

Abstract STUDY QUESTION Can animation videos on how to optimize the chances of pregnancy influence stress, anxiety, depression and sexual functioning of individuals trying to conceive (TTC)? SUMMARY ANSWER There were no differences between those educated to have intercourse every other day, on the fertile window and a control group (CG), and depression and sexual dysfunction significantly increased over time for all arms. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Recent findings indicate that time to pregnancy can be significantly shortened by targeting the fertile period, but some reproductive care guidelines recommend instead the practice of intercourse every other day on the basis that it is less stressful to the couple. Evidence to support guidelines on how to preserve well-being and psychosocial adjustment and optimize pregnancy chances is lacking. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION We conducted a prospective, double-blinded, three-arm randomized controlled trial between July 2016 and November 2019. Participants were randomized to either not having any stimulus (CG) or visualizing a short animated video explaining how to improve chances of pregnancy by having intercourse every other day (EOD group), or by monitoring the fertile window (FWM group). Assessments were made before the intervention (T0), and 6 weeks (T1), 6 months (T2) and 12 months after (T3), with follow-ups censored in case of pregnancy. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Participants were childless individuals of reproductive age actively TTC and not diagnosed or unaware of a condition that could prevent spontaneous pregnancy. Individuals were excluded from recruitment if they had previous children or had a condition preventing spontaneous pregnancy. Our primary outcome was stress and secondary outcomes included anxiety, depression, sexual functioning and pregnancy. Primary analyses were performed according to intention-to-treat principle. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Of the 450 randomized participants 127 were educated to use an every-other-day strategy, 135 to monitor the fertile window, and 134 received no intervention. Groups were similar regarding demographics and months TTC. Repeated measures analysis revealed that there were no significant interaction effects of psychological and sexual well-being between groups over time (P > 0.05). Significant time effects were revealed for stress (F(3,855) = 4.94, P < 0.01), depression (F(3,855) = 14.22, P < 0.01) and sexual functioning (time effects P values <0.001 for female sexual functioning dimensions and <0.002 for male dimensions), but not for anxiety (F(2,299) = 0.51, P > 0.05). Stress levels lowered after 6 months (P < 0.001) and returned to baseline levels at the 1-year follow-up. Depressive symptomatology significantly increased at 6 weeks (P = 0.023), and again 1 year after (P = 0.001). There were also significant decreases in all female sexual functioning dimensions (desire, satisfaction, arousal, pain, orgasm and lubrication). In men, there were significant variations in orgasm, intercourse satisfaction and erectile function, but not desire and sexual satisfaction. Revealed pregnancy rates were 16% for participants in the EOD group, 30% for the FWM group and 20% for the CG. Pregnancies were not significantly different between arms: EOD vs FWM (odds ratio (OR) 2.32; 95% CI 0.92–5.83); EOD vs CG (OR 0.74; 95% CI 0.30–1.87); and FWM vs CG (OR 1.71; 95% CI 0.70–4.18). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Participants were recruited after transitioning to procreative sex. The study might be prone to bias as almost 30% of our sample fulfilled the chronological criterion for infertility, and other reproductive strategies could have been tried over time before recruitment. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Our data suggest that stress does not arise from feeling pressured on the fertile period and that advice on timing of intercourse might have to be personalized. The increasing levels of depression and sexual dysfunction over a year emphasize the crucial role of preconception care and fertility counseling in promoting psychological and sexual well-being. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This work was supported by European Union Funds (FEDER/COMPETE—Operational Competitiveness Programme) and by national funds (FCT—Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology) under the projects PTDC/MHC-PSC/4195/2012 and SFRH/BPD/85789/2012. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02814006. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE 27 June 2016 DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLLMENT 19 July 2016

Funder

European Union Funds

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Rehabilitation,Reproductive Medicine

Reference58 articles.

1. Optimizing natural fertility: a committee opinion;American Society for Reproductive Medicine Practice Committee and Society for Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility Practice Committee;Fertil Steril,2022

2. Efficacy of the new TwoDay Method of family planning;Arévalo;Fertil Steril,2004

3. Hormonal imbalances and psychological scars left behind in infertile men;Bak;J Androl,2012

4. Use of the Internet and e-mail for health care information: results from a national survey;Baker;JAMA,2003

5. Women’s preventive services initiative: fertility counseling overlooked;Bakkensen;Am J Obstet Gynecol,2022

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3