Transgender persons’ view on previous fertility decision-making and current infertility: a qualitative study

Author:

Asseler J D123ORCID,de Nie I1234ORCID,van Rooij F B5ORCID,Steensma T D26ORCID,Mosterd D1,Verhoeven M O13,Goddijn M37ORCID,Huirne J A F13ORCID,van Mello N M123ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam , Amsterdam, The Netherlands

2. Centre of Expertise on Gender Dysphoria, Amsterdam UMC , Amsterdam, The Netherlands

3. Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute , Amsterdam, The Netherlands

4. Department of Endocrinology, Amsterdam UMC , Amsterdam, The Netherlands

5. Research Institute Child Development and Education, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam, The Netherlands

6. Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC , Amsterdam, The Netherlands

7. Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Abstract

Abstract STUDY QUESTION How do adult transgender and gender diverse (TGD) people, who are infertile due to prior gender-affirming treatment, view their current infertility and their reproductive decisions made in the past? SUMMARY ANSWER In a time where sterilization was mandatory, transgender adolescents prioritized gender-affirming treatment over their future fertility and would make the same choice today despite emotional challenges related to infertility experienced by some. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Under transgender law in the Netherlands, sterilization was required for legal gender recognition until 2014, resulting in permanent infertility. The long-term consequences of this iatrogenic infertility in transgender adolescents who have now reached adulthood remain underexplored. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION Qualitative study design based on 21 in-depth one-on-one semi-structured interviews. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS TGD people in a stage of life where family planning may be a current topic were eligible for participation. They all received gender-affirming treatment in adolescence prior to the legislation change in 2014. A purposeful sampling technique was used from participants of another ongoing study. Eleven people assigned female at birth and ten people assigned male at birth were included. Interview transcripts were thematically analysed using a modified version of Braun and Clarke’s six steps theory. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Six main themes were generated: (i) personal considerations regarding fertility and fertility preservation in the past; (ii) external considerations regarding fertility and fertility preservation in the past; (iii) current vision on past considerations and decisions; (iv) Current experiences and coping with infertility; (v) future family building; (vi) advice regarding fertility and fertility preservation decision-making. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Selection, recall, and choice supportive bias may play a role in interpreting our results. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS This study highlights the importance of tailored counselling and comprehensive information on fertility preservation for transgender individuals, especially adolescents, undergoing gender-affirming treatment. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) N/A. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3