When May UN Peacekeepers Use Lethal Force to Protect Civilians? Reconciling Threats to Civilians, Imminence, and the Right to Life

Author:

Bourgeois Hanna1,Labuda Patryk I2

Affiliation:

1. Research Foundation—Flanders (FWO), Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies & Institute for International Law PhD Fellow of the , KU Leuven, Belgium. E-mail: hanna.bourgeois@kuleuven.be

2. International (Criminal) Law, University of Amsterdam School of Law Assistant Professor of , The Netherlands

Abstract

Abstract While the use of force in UN peacekeeping was traditionally limited to self-defence, the UN Security Council now regularly deploys peacekeeping missions with robust mandates to protect civilians and encourages their proactive implementation, including by using force. For many years, the Security Council authorised the use of ‘all necessary means’ to protect civilians from ‘imminent threats’ of physical violence, but its recent mandates have often dropped references to ‘imminence’. The UN has also interpreted such mandates as broader authorisation for peacekeepers to use force in response to temporally ill-defined threats to civilians. This turn to robust civilian protection is often celebrated, yet the legal parameters of using force continue to evolve below the radar and are rarely scrutinised, with scholarly writing focused on peacekeeper self-defence, rules of engagement and UN policy to justify proactive mandate implementation. Drawing on an analysis of the relationship between peacekeeping mandates and international law in light of the shift from defensive to proactive peacekeeping, this article argues that the legality of using force for civilian protection purposes must be reconciled not only with Security Council resolutions and their language on imminence, but also with human rights law (HRL), which imposes strict temporal conditions for lawful deprivations of the right to life outside the conduct of hostilities. Using examples of how the UN’s current practice of using force to protect civilians in hostile environments may contravene international norms, this article attempts to reconcile proactive civilian-oriented peacekeeping with the concept of imminence as understood in HRL.

Funder

FWO

Fonds National Suisse

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Law,Safety Research,Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Mothers at peace: International peacebuilding and post-conflict fertility;Journal of Development Economics;2024-03

2. Bibliography;Leiden Journal of International Law;2023-08-14

3. UN Peacekeeping at 75: Achievements, Challenges, and Prospects;International Peacekeeping;2023-08-08

4. Correction to: When May UN Peacekeepers Use Lethal Force to Protect Civilians? Reconciling Threats to Civilians, Imminence, and the Right to Life;Journal of Conflict and Security Law;2023-01-20

5. The UN and the Protection of Civilians: Sustaining the Momentum;Journal of Conflict and Security Law;2023-01-10

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3