Exploring Conflicts in Whole Genome Phylogenetics: A Case Study Within Manakins (Aves: Pipridae)

Author:

Zhao Min1,Kurtis Sarah M1,White Noor D23ORCID,Moncrieff Andre E4,Leite Rafael N5,Brumfield Robb T4ORCID,Braun Edward L1,Kimball Rebecca T1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biology, University of Florida , Gainesville, FL 32611 , USA

2. Neurobiology-Neurodegeneration and Repair Laboratory, National Eye Institute , Bethesda, MD 20892 , USA

3. Department of Vertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution , Washington, DC 20560 , USA

4. Department of Biological Sciences and Museum of Natural Science, Louisiana State University , Baton Rouge, LA 70803 , USA and

5. Graduate Program in Ecology, National Institute of Amazonian Research , Manaus, AM , Brazil

Abstract

Abstract Abstract.—Some phylogenetic problems remain unresolved even when large amounts of sequence data are analyzed and methods that accommodate processes such as incomplete lineage sorting are employed. In addition to investigating biological sources of phylogenetic incongruence, it is also important to reduce noise in the phylogenomic dataset by using appropriate filtering approach that addresses gene tree estimation errors. We present the results of a case study in manakins, focusing on the very difficult clade comprising the genera Antilophia and Chiroxiphia. Previous studies suggest that Antilophia is nested within Chiroxiphia, though relationships among Antilophia+Chiroxiphia species have been highly unstable. We extracted more than 11,000 loci (ultra-conserved elements and introns) from whole genomes and conducted analyses using concatenation and multispecies coalescent methods. Topologies resulting from analyses using all loci differed depending on the data type and analytical method, with 2 clades (Antilophia+Chiroxiphia and Manacus+Pipra+Machaeopterus) in the manakin tree showing incongruent results. We hypothesized that gene trees that conflicted with a long coalescent branch (e.g., the branch uniting Antilophia+Chiroxiphia) might be enriched for cases of gene tree estimation error, so we conducted analyses that either constrained those gene trees to include monophyly of Antilophia+Chiroxiphia or excluded these loci. While constraining trees reduced some incongruence, excluding the trees led to completely congruent species trees, regardless of the data type or model of sequence evolution used. We found that a suite of gene metrics (most importantly the number of informative sites and likelihood of intralocus recombination) collectively explained the loci that resulted in non-monophyly of Antilophia+Chiroxiphia. We also found evidence for introgression that may have contributed to the discordant topologies we observe in Antilophia+Chiroxiphia and led to deviations from expectations given the multispecies coalescent model. Our study highlights the importance of identifying factors that can obscure phylogenetic signal when dealing with recalcitrant phylogenetic problems, such as gene tree estimation error, incomplete lineage sorting, and reticulation events. [Birds; c-gene; data type; gene estimation error; model fit; multispecies coalescent; phylogenomics; reticulation]

Funder

United States National Science Foundation

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Genetics,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Reference101 articles.

1. Genome-wide interrogation advances resolution of recalcitrant groups in the tree of life;Arcila;Nat. Ecol. Evol,2017

2. The recombination landscape of the zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata genome;Backström;Genome Res,2010

3. Catalogue of Life Checklist (Version 2021-08-25);Bánki;Catalog. Life,2021

4. Connections between the Atlantic and the Amazonian forest avifaunas represent distinct historical events;Batalha-Filho;J. Ornithol,2013

5. EvobiR: tools for comparative analyses and teaching evolutionary biology.;Blackmon,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3