Affiliation:
1. Department of Philosophy, Oakland University, 146 Library Drive, Rochester, MI 48309, USA
2. Campbell Geology Museum, Clemson University, 140 Discovery Lane, Clemson SC 29634, USA
Abstract
AbstractThe last half century of paleornithological research has transformed the way that biologists perceive the evolutionary history of birds. This transformation has been driven, since 1969, by a series of exciting fossil discoveries combined with intense scientific debate over how best to interpret these discoveries. Ideally, as evidence accrues and results accumulate, interpretive scientific agreement forms. But this has not entirely happened in the debate over avian origins: the accumulation of scientific evidence and analyses has had some effect, but not a conclusive one, in terms of resolving the question of avian origins. Although the majority of biologists have come to accept that birds are dinosaurs, there is lingering and, in some quarters, strident opposition to this view. In order to both understand the ongoing disagreement about avian origins and generate a prediction about the future of the debate, here we use a revised model of scientific practice to assess the current and historical state of play surrounding the topic of bird evolutionary origins. Many scientists are familiar with the metascientific scholars Sir Karl Popper and Thomas Kuhn, and these are the primary figures that have been appealed to so far, in prior attempts to assess the dispute. But we demonstrate that a variation of Imre Lakatos’s model of progressive versus degenerative research programmes provides a novel and productive assessment of the debate. We establish that a refurbished Lakatosian account both explains the intractability of the dispute and predicts a likely outcome for the debate about avian origins. In short, here, we offer a metascientific tool for rationally assessing competing theories—one that allows researchers involved in seemingly intractable scientific disputes to advance their debates.
Funder
Field Museum of Natural History
University Research Committee Faculty Research Fellowship
Oakland University
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Genetics,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference69 articles.
1. Dinosaur monophyly and a new class of vertebrates;Bakker;Nature.,1974
2. A new hypothesis of dinosaur relationships and early dinosaur evolution;Baron;Nature.,2017
3. Carnivorous dinosaurs from the Cretaceous of Mongolia;Barsbold;Transactions of the Joint Soviet Mongolian Paleontological Expedition. Soviet-Mogolian.,1983
4. The arboreal origin of avian flight;Bock;Mem. Calif. Acad. Sci.,1986
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献