Pulled Diversification Rates, Lineages-Through-Time Plots and Modern Macroevolutionary Modelling

Author:

Helmstetter Andrew J1,Glemin Sylvain2,Käfer Jos3,Zenil-Ferguson Rosana4,Sauquet Herv56,de Boer Hugo7,Dagallier Léo-Paul M J8,Mazet Nathan9,Reboud Eliette L9,Couvreur Thomas L P8,Condamine Fabien L9

Affiliation:

1. Fondation pour la Recherche sur la Biodiversité - Centre for the Synthesis and Analysis of Biodiversity, 34000 Montpellier, France

2. CNRS, Ecosystmes Biodiversit Evolution (Universit de Rennes), 35000 Rennes, France

3. Universit de Lyon, Universit Lyon 1, CNRS, Laboratoire de Biomtrie et Biologie Evolutive UMR 5558, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France

4. School of Life Sciences, University of Hawaii Manoa, Honolulu, HI, 96822, USA

5. National Herbarium of New South Wales, Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust, Sydney, New South Wales, 2000, Australia

6. Evolution and Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

7. Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, 0318 Oslo, Norway

8. IRD, DIADE, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France

9. CNRS, Institut des Sciences de l’Evolution de Montpellier (Universit de Montpellier), Place Eugne Bataillon, 34095 Montpellier, France

Abstract

Abstract Estimating time-dependent rates of speciation and extinction from dated phylogenetic trees of extant species (timetrees), and determining how and why they vary, is key to understanding how ecological and evolutionary processes shape biodiversity. Due to an increasing availability of phylogenetic trees, a growing number of process-based methods relying on the birth-death model have been developed in the last decade to address a variety of questions in macroevolution. However, this methodological progress has regularly been criticised such that one may wonder how reliable the estimations of speciation and extinction rates are. In particular, using lineages-through-time (LTT) plots, a recent study (Louca and Pennell, 2020) has shown that there are an infinite number of equally likely diversification scenarios that can generate any timetree. This has led to questioning whether or not diversification rates should be estimated at all. Here we summarize, clarify, and highlight technical considerations on recent findings regarding the capacity of models to disentangle diversification histories. Using simulations we illustrate the characteristics of newly-proposed “pulled rates” and their utility. We recognize that the recent findings are a step forward in understanding the behavior of macroevolutionary modelling, but they in no way suggest we should abandon diversification modelling altogether. On the contrary, the study of macroevolution using phylogenetic trees has never been more exciting and promising than today. We still face important limitations in regard to data availability and methods, but by acknowledging them we can better target our joint efforts as a scientific community.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Genetics,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3