False positive amphetamines and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine immunoassays in the presence of metoprolol—two cases reported in clinical toxicology

Author:

Leclercq Marion1,Soichot Marion1,Delhotal-Landes Brigitte1,Bourgogne Emmanuel1,Gourlain Hervé1,Mégarbane Bruno23,Labat Laurence13

Affiliation:

1. Service de Toxicologie, Hôpital Lariboisière, AP-HP, 2 Rue Ambroise Paré, Paris 75010, France

2. Service de Réanimation Médicale et Toxicologique, Hôpital Lariboisière, AP-HP, 2 Rue Ambroise Paré, Paris 75010, France

3. INSERM UMRS-1144, Universités Paris-Descartes et Paris-Diderot, 4 Avenue de l’Observatoire, Paris 75006, France

Abstract

Abstract Amphetamines, frequently used recreational drugs with high risk of toxicity, are commonly included in urine drug screens. This screening is based on enzyme immunoassay, which is a quick and easy-to-perform technique, but may lack specificity resulting from cross-reactivity with other compounds, causing false positive results. We present two cases of presumed false positive MULTIGENT® amphetamine/methamphetamine and MULTIGENT® ecstasy (Abbott®) immunoassays with the beta-blocker metoprolol. Both metoprolol-poisoned patients presented positive urine screening despite no history of drug abuse. No confirmation for amphetamine molecular structures was found with gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. The cross-reactivity was further investigated by doping urine samples with metoprolol and its two major phase-I metabolites. Metoprolol showed positive results for both amphetamine and MDMA tests at low concentrations (200 and 150 μg/mL, respectively). Metoprolol metabolites cross-reacted with the amphetamines immunoassay only, but at higher concentrations (i.e., 2000 μg/mL for α-hydroxymetoprolol and 750 μg/mL for O-demethylmetoprolol). In conclusion, false positive results in amphetamines and MDMA immunoassays are possible in the presence of metoprolol. Toxicologists should be aware of frequent analytical interferences with immunoassays and a detailed medication history should be taken into consideration for interpretation. In vitro investigation of suspected cross-reactivity should include not only the parent drug but also its related metabolites.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Chemical Health and Safety,Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Toxicology,Environmental Chemistry,Analytical Chemistry

Reference18 articles.

1. False-positive interferences of common urine drug screen immunoassays: a review;Saitman;Journal of Analytical Toxicology,2014

2. Reduced interference by phenothiazines in amphetamine drug of abuse immunoassays;Melanson;Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine,2006

3. Case reports of aripiprazole causing false-positive urine amphetamine drug screens in children;Kaplan;Pediatrics,2015

4. Cyclic antidepressants screening in emergency toxicology: immunoassay study through cross-reactivity and molecular structures;Bazin;Toxicologie Analytique et Clinique,2015

5. Urine drug screening: practical guide for clinicians;Moeller;Mayo Clinic Proceedings,2008

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3