Affiliation:
1. Norwegian Institute of International Affairs, Norway
2. University of Gothenburg, Sweden
Abstract
Abstract
As the number of international rankings has risen dramatically since the 1990s, a large body of scholarship has emerged to examine and understand them. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of this body of work and to chart out fruitful directions for future research. In short, prior scholarship has been surprisingly quiet on the relations among multiple actors and their economic dimensions at the core of country performance indicator (CPI) activities. To foreground crucial socioeconomic relations, we develop a relational heuristic based upon a sports analogy: the actors involved in the creation and maintenance of CPIs can fruitfully be approached as a complex of players, referees, coaches, and audiences. Such an account helps us better understand how CPIs emerge and are sustained, even when they rely on dodgy data and their effects are perverse. We use nation brand rankings—overlooked in international relations research—as empirical illustration.
Funder
Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference87 articles.
1. Tyskland—Världens Bästa Land;Aftonbladet,2014
2. USA Rasar i Varumärkesranking—‘Vi Ser en Trumpeffekt’;———,2017
3. Anholt Nation Brands Index: How does the World See America?;———;Journal of Advertising Research,2005
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献