Affiliation:
1. Erasmus MC University Medical Centre , Rotterdam , The Netherlands
Abstract
Abstract
Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) provides an excellent case study to investigate emerging conceptions of health, disease, pre-disease, and risk. Two scientific working groups have recently reconceptualized AD and created a new category of asymptomatic biomarker positive persons, who are either said to have preclinical AD, or to be at risk for AD. This article examines how prominent theories of health and disease would classify this condition: healthy or diseased? Next, the notion of being “at risk”—a state somewhere in-between health and disease—is considered from various angles. It is concluded that medical-scientific developments urge us to let go of dichotomous ways of understanding disease, that the notion of “risk,” conceptualized as an increased chance of getting a symptomatic disease, might be a useful addition to our conceptual framework, and that we should pay more attention to the practical usefulness and implications of the ways in which we draw lines and define concepts.
Funder
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Dutch Research Council
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Philosophy,General Medicine,Issues, ethics and legal aspects
Reference44 articles.
1. The ethics of prodromal and preclinical disease states.;Arias,2017
2. On the distinction between disease and illness;Boorse;Philosophy & Public Affairs,1975
3. Health as a theoretical concept;Philosophy of Science,1977
4. A rebuttal on health.;Humber,1997
5. A second rebuttal on health;Journal of Medicine and Philosophy,2014
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献