Affiliation:
1. Niagara University , New York , USA
Abstract
Abstract
There is a significant debate over the moral status of human embryos. This debate has important implications for practices like abortion and IVF. Some argue that embryos have the same moral status as infants, children, and adults. However, critics claim that the frequency of pregnancy loss/miscarriage/spontaneous abortion shows a moral inconsistency in this view. One line of criticism is that those who know the facts about pregnancy loss and nevertheless attempt to conceive children are willing to sacrifice embryos lost for the healthy children they ultimately have. I respond to this criticism and argue that on the most plausible accounts of well-being, these embryos are not made worse off and thus not “sacrifices.” I then make some more general remarks about what people’s typical views about pregnancy loss show about their views toward the moral status of embryos.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Philosophy,General Medicine,Issues, ethics and legal aspects
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Future Lives and Deaths with Purpose: Perspectives on Capacity, Character, and Intent;The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine;2024-09-03
2. Public Bioethics Amidst a Pluralist People: A Project of Presumption, Despair, or Hope?;The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine;2024-07-11
3. Public Reason, Bioethics, and Public Policy: A Seductive Delusion or Ambitious Aspiration?;Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics;2024-03-11
4. Unintended Intrauterine Death and Preterm Delivery: What Does Philosophy Have to Offer?;The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine;2023-05-16