Priority for Organ Donors in the Allocation of Organs: Priority Rules from the Perspective of Equality of Opportunity

Author:

Albertsen Andreas1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Aarhus University , Aarhus , Denmark

Abstract

Abstract Should priority in the allocation of organs be given to those who have previously donated or declared their willingness to do so? This article examines the Israeli priority rule in light of two prominent critiques of priority rules, pertaining to failure to reciprocate and unfairness. The scope and content of these critiques are interpreted from the perspective of equality of opportunity. Because the Israeli priority rule may be reasonably criticized for unfairness and failing to reward certain behaviors, the article develops an adjusted priority rule, which removes and adjust the elements in the Israeli priority rule deemed problematic. However, such a priority rule is complex to the extent that it may fail to increase donation rates and furthermore introduce new concerns of fairness, as the better off may be better able to navigate the complex adjusted priority rule.

Funder

Danish Research Council

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Philosophy,General Medicine,Issues, ethics and legal aspects

Reference81 articles.

1. Luck egalitarianism, social determinants and public health initiatives.;Albertsen;Public Health Ethics,2015

2. Tough luck and tough choices: Applying luck egalitarianism to oral health;Journal of Medicine and Philosophy,2015

3. Drinking in the last chance saloon: Luck egalitarianism, alcohol consumption, and the organ transplant waiting list;Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy,2016

4. Priority to organ donors: Personal responsibility, equal access and the priority rule in organ procurement;Diametros,2017

5. Personal responsibility in health and health care: Luck egalitarianism as a plausible and flexible approach to health;Political Research Quarterly,2019

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Efficiency and the futures market in organs;Monash Bioethics Review;2023-09-09

2. Bioethics: Shaping Medical Practice and Taking Diversity Seriously;The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine;2023-06-20

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3