Patient Expertise and Medical Authority: Epistemic Implications for the Provider–Patient Relationship

Author:

Watson Jamie Carlin1

Affiliation:

1. Cleveland Clinic Center for Bioethics , Cleveland, Ohio , USA

Abstract

Abstract The provider–patient relationship is typically regarded as an expert-to-novice relationship, and with good reason. Providers have extensive education and experience that have developed in them the competence to treat conditions better and with fewer harms than anyone else. However, some researchers argue that many patients with long-term conditions (LTCs), such as arthritis and chronic pain, have become “experts” at managing their LTC. Unfortunately, there is no generally agreed-upon conception of “patient expertise” or what it implies for the provider–patient relationship. I review three prominent accounts of patient expertise and argue that all face serious objections. I contend, however, that a plausible account of patient expertise is available and that it provides a framework both for further empirical studies and for enhancing the provider–patient relationship.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Philosophy,General Medicine,Issues, ethics and legal aspects

Reference41 articles.

1. Relativism, rationalism and the sociology of knowledge;Barnes,1982

2. The patient examines the doctor;Broyard,1992

3. The process-performance paradox in expert judgment: How can experts know so much and predict so badly;Camerer,1991

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Co-Reasoning in Context: Collaboration in Critical Care;The American Journal of Bioethics;2024-09

2. What Are Humans Doing in the Loop? Co-Reasoning and Practical Judgment When Using Machine Learning-Driven Decision Aids;The American Journal of Bioethics;2024-05-20

3. Deferring to Expertise whilst Maintaining Autonomy;Episteme;2024-02-15

4. Society, Social Structures, and Community in Clinical Ethics;The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine;2024-01-13

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3