A Network Analysis of Clinical Variables in Chronic Pain: A Study from the Swedish Quality Registry for Pain Rehabilitation (SQRP)

Author:

Åkerblom Sophia12,Cervin Matti3,Perrin Sean2,Rivano Fischer Marcelo14,Gerdle Björn5,McCracken Lance M6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pain Rehabilitation, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden

2. Department of Psychology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden

3. Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden

4. Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden

5. Pain and Rehabilitation Centre, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden

6. Division of Clinical Psychology, Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

Abstract

Abstract Background Efforts to identify specific variables that impact most on outcomes from interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation are challenged by the complexity of chronic pain. Methods to manage this complexity are needed. The purpose of the study was to determine the network structure entailed in a set of self-reported variables, examine change, and look at potential predictors of outcome, from a network perspective. Methods In this study we apply network analysis to a large sample of people seeking interdisciplinary pain treatment (N = 2,241). Variables analyzed include pain intensity, pain interference, extent of pain, depression, anxiety, insomnia, and psychological variables from cognitive behavioral models of chronic pain. Results We found that Acceptance, Pain Interference, and Depression were key, “central,” variables in the pretreatment network. Interestingly, there were few changes in the overall network configuration following treatment, specifically with respect to which variables appear most central relative to each other. On the other hand, Catastrophizing, Depression, Anxiety, and Pain Interference each became less central over time. Changes in Life Control, Acceptance, and Anxiety were most strongly related to changes in the remainder of the network as a whole. Finally, no network differences were found between treatment responders and non-responders. Conclusions This study highlights potential future targets for pain treatment. Further application of a network approach to interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation data is recommended. Going forward, it may be better to next do this in a more comprehensive theoretically guided fashion, and ideographically, to detect unique individual differences in potential treatment processes.

Funder

Swedish Research Council

County council of Östergötland

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Neurology (clinical),General Medicine

Reference59 articles.

1. Evidence-based scientific data documenting the treatment and cost-effectiveness of comprehensive pain programs for chronic nonmalignant pain;Gatchel;J Pain,2006

2. Behavioral and cognitive-behavioral treatment for chronic pain: Outcome, predictors of outcome, and treatment process;McCracken;Spine,2002

3. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of treatments for patients with chronic pain;Turk;Clin J Pain,2002

4. Psychological therapies for the management of chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults;Williams;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2012

5. Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain;Kamper;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3