Professionalization of the public health workforce: scoping review and call to action

Author:

Czabanowska Katarzyna12ORCID,Rodriguez Feria Pablo13ORCID,Kuhlmann Ellen45,Kostoulas Polychronis6ORCID,Middleton John7,Magana Laura8,Sutton Gabriella9,Goodman Julien10,Burazeri Genc11,Aleksandrova Olga12,Piven Natalia12

Affiliation:

1. Department of International Health, Care and Public Health Research Institute CAPHRI, FHML, Maastricht University , Maastricht, The Netherlands

2. Department of Health Policy Management, Institute of Public Health, Jagiellonian University , Krakow, Poland

3. Departamento de Salud Pública, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Los Andes , Bogota, Colombia

4. European Public Health Association Section Health Workforce Research (EUPHA-HWR), Utrecht, The Netherlands

5. Institute of Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health System Research, Hannover Medical School , Hannover, Germany

6. School of Public & One Health, University of Thessaly , Greece

7. John Middleton, ASPHER , Brussels, Belgium

8. ASPPH , Washington, DC, USA

9. EuroHealthNet , Brussels, Belgium

10. APHEA , Brussels, Belgium

11. University of Medicine , Tirana, Albania

12. WHO Country Office , Kyiv, Ukraine

Abstract

Abstract Background The ‘WHO-ASPHER Roadmap to Professionalizing the Public Health Workforce in the European Region’ provides recommendations for strategic and systematic workforce planning around professionalization levers including: (i) competencies, (ii) training and education, (iii) formal organization, (iv) professional credentialing and (v) code of ethics and professional conduct as well as taxonomy and enumeration. It was based on a literature review till 2016. This scoping review aims to explore how the professionalization was documented in the literature between 2016 and 2022. Methods Following the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines, we searched Medline via PubMed, Web of Science, ERIC via EBSCO and Google Scholar and included studies on professionalization levers. Four critical appraisal tools were used to assess qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods studies and grey literature. The PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) was used for reporting. Results Eleven articles included in this review spanned 61 countries, targeting undergraduate, master’s, doctoral degrees and continuing professional development. Most of these documents were reviews. About half provided a definition of the public health workforce; more than half covered the taxonomy and included information about competences, but the use of frameworks was sporadic and inconsistent. Formal organization and the necessity of a code of conduct for the public health workforce were acknowledged in only two studies. Conclusions In spite of some efforts to professionalize the public health workforce, this process is fragmented and not fully recognized and supported. There is an urgent need to engage policymakers and stakeholders to prioritize investments in strengthening the public health workforce worldwide.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3