Determinants of non-participation in colon examination following positive stool sample in colorectal cancer screening

Author:

Deding Ulrik1ORCID,Henig Anna Sharon1,Hindersson Peter2,Torp-Pedersen Christian13,Bøggild Henrik13

Affiliation:

1. Public Health and Epidemiology Group, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg Øst, Denmark

2. Clinical Biochemistry, Regional Hospital North, Hjørring, Denmark

3. Unit of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark

Abstract

Abstract Background Social inequalities has been shown for participation in colorectal cancer screening and recently in the initial stool sample blood test. If these differences persist at follow-up colon examination after a positive stool test, it would suggest that social inequality in screening may be greater than the inequality observed in initial stool sample blood test. Methods All data were derived from national registers. Using logistic regression analyses, odds of non-participation for follow-up colon examination were estimated based on age group, educational level, income quartile, immigration status and marital status in men and in women, who had participated in initial stool sample test for blood with a positive result. Results Among 20 849 men and 16 565 women invited for follow-up colonoscopy in the period 2014–15, 10.63 and 11.37%, respectively, did not attend. In men, odds of non-participation were higher in the eldest, those with lower income and lower educational level, in immigrants and in singles. Odds ratio (OR) in males of highest income quartile was 0.54 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.46; 0.63] compared with lowest income quartile. In women, the differences were not as large. OR in females of highest income quartile was 0.73 (95% CI 0.61; 0.87) compared with lowest income quartile. Conclusion Sociodemographic differences in odds of non-participation exist in follow-up colon examination in the Danish colorectal cancer screening. Differences were evident in all subgroups of the male population. The same patterns were seen in women. Social inequalities in participation for follow-up colon examination can increase overall social inequality and consequently, lead to health disparities.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference33 articles.

1. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012;Ferlay;Eur J Cancer,2013

2. Sociodemographic predictors of participation in colorectal cancer screening;Deding;Int J Colorectal Dis,2017

3. Cancer screening uptake: association with individual characteristics, geographic distribution, and time trends in Italy;Carrozzi;Epidemiol Prev,2015

4. Implementation of colorectal cancer screening in Finland: experiences from the first three years of a public health programme;Malila;Z Gastroenterol,2008

5. Denmark: health system review;Olejaz;Heal Syst Transit,2012

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3