Digital health technologies: a systematic review of their cost-effectiveness

Author:

Puleo V1,Gentili A1,Failla G2,Melnyk A1,Di Tanna G3,Ricciardi W1,Cascini F1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Section of Hygiene and Public Health, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy

2. Department of Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy

3. Statistics Division, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

Abstract

Abstract Background Digital health interventions have a potential to improve safety, efficacy and quality of care, reducing waste in healthcare costs. Despite premises, the evidence regarding cost and effectiveness of digital tools in health is scarce and limited. Objectives: The aim of this systematic review is to summarize the evidence on cost-effectiveness of digital health interventions and to assess whether the studies meet the established quality criteria. Methods We queried PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases for articles in English published from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2020 that performed economic evaluations of digital health technologies. The methodological rigorousness of studies was assessed with a well-established checklist (CHEERS). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)was calculated when the reviewed study reported related data but did not express the ICER. Results Searches identified 1476 results, 552 of which were selected for abstract and 35 were included in this review. The studies were heterogeneous by country, type of eHealth intervention, method of implementation, and reporting perspectives. The qualitative analysis identified the economic and effectiveness evaluation of seven different types of interventions: fourteen studies on a new telemedicine service; five on telecounseling; five on teletherapy; two on telemonitoring; five on new mobile applications; two on m-health programs; one on digital platforms and one on electronic health records. Conclusions Findings on cost-effectiveness of digital interventions showed a growing body of evidence and suggested a generally favorable effect in terms of costs and health outcomes. However, due to the heterogeneity across study methods, the comparison between interventions still remains difficult. Further research based on a standardized approach is needed in order to methodically analyze incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, costs, and health benefits. Key messages Digital interventions suggested a favorable effect in terms of costs and health outcomes. Digital health interventions have a potential to improve safety, efficacy and quality of care.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3