How to govern the digital transformation of health services

Author:

Ricciardi Walter12,Pita Barros Pedro3,Bourek Aleš4,Brouwer Werner5,Kelsey Tim6,Lehtonen Lasse7,Anastasy Christian,Barros Pedro,Barry Margaret,Bourek Aleš,Brouwer Werner,De Maeseneer Jan,Kringos Dionne,Lehtonen Lasse,McKee Martin,Murauskiene Liubove,Nuti Sabina,Ricciardi Walter,Siciliani Luigi,Wild Claudia,

Affiliation:

1. Hygiene section, Public Health Institute, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy

2. Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health - Public Health Area, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy

3. Nova School of Business and Economics, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal

4. Masaryk University, Faculty of Medicine, Center for Healthcare Quality, Brno, Czech Republic

5. Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands

6. Australian Digital Health Agency, Sidney, Australia

7. Department of Public Health, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

Abstract

Abstract The impact of digitalization of health services has been profound and is expected to be even more profound in the future. It is important to evaluate whether digital health services contribute to health system goals in an optimal way. This should be done at the level of the service, not the ‘digital transformation’. Decisions to adopt new digital health services, at different levels of the health care system, are ideally based on evidence regarding their performance in light of health system goals. In order to evaluate this, a broad perspective should be taken in evaluations of digital health services. Attainment of the broad health system goals, including quality, efficiency and equity, are objectives against which to judge new digital health services. These goals in a broad sense are unaltered by the process of digitalization. Governance should be designed and tailored in such a way to capture all relevant changes in an adequate way. When evaluating digital health services many specific aspects need to be considered. Like for other innovations and (new) technologies, such promises may or may not materialize and potential benefits may also be accompanied by unintended and/or negative (side) effects in the short or long term. Hence, the introduction, implementation, use and funding of digital health technologies should be carefully evaluated and monitored. Governments should play a more active role in the further optimization both of the process of decision making (both at the central and decentral level) and the related outcomes. They need to find a balance between centralized and decentralized activity. Moreover, the broader preparation of the health care system to be able to deal with digitalization, from education, through financial and regulatory preconditions, to implementation of monitoring systems to monitor its effects on health system performance remains important.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3